Thứ Ba, 29 tháng 1, 2019

Auto news on Youtube Jan 29 2019

I recently used an expression, 'Real Bread,' to French students.

This is not exactly what I wanted to say.

I wanted to say 'French is also known for the architecture'.

But I somehow said that.

And then some commenters said I was not confident enough about my own culture,

and asked me why I became culturally flunky.

I thought of if I should make this video or not for two days, and ended up turning on this camera.

I have a strong opinion on this subject,

which I'm about to talk about now.

If you've ever had such offense in my videos, please listen carefully.

But I need to make something clear in advance.

What I'm going to say from now own isn't necessarily because of those who made comments there.

This is what I've been feeling throughout the 2 years for making Internet videos and the comments I've got.

Then let's get started.

As you know, one of my best friends is Art,

but there's also another best friend called 수만.

He's name is Ismail, a Moroccan,

but we, Korean gangs, were so close to him, so we just called him 수만.

We made a Korean name for him.

Then now we made a Korean name for Ismail, who is a foreigner.

Is there anyone who think it's a problem?

I personally think there's no problem.

The name Suman sounds beautiful and also feels friendly,

and maybe it's just one of those ways to get close.

But then, 서재영, who is me, is also using an English name called Mickey,

so, is there anyone who think it's a problem?

Yeah, I'm a Korean.

And I'm extremely proud of this fact.

But I don't like my foreign friends consdering me a 'Korean friend'.

And vice versa.

'cuz we're just friends.

I often make fun of the US and Russia in front of Art off the camera,

and I do play with the British accent in front of Mandy like,

It's no big deal.

'cuz we're just friends.

Only 'foreign friends' and a 'Korean friend' would have such problem.

"Europeans have different mindset, so if you're not confident enough about your own culture, they don't respect you."

"No matter what kinda cultural background you have, you'll be treated equally if you have the confidence."

"That's why you don't lower yourself to be humble."

"Don't lower yourself, but be proud of yourself, then people listen to you and recognize you."

"I think that's what the western culture is about."

I'm afraid other subscribers would think it's true, so let me make it clear.

The reality is exactly the opposite.

In the western society, they put nationalities behind, but they just look at you as a person.

It only matters if you're a good person or not.

It's not your culture that matters.

Don't generalize your bad experiences with the white people outside Korea.

You're just repeating the hatred you got to other unrelated people.

Also, it then affects other Korean people as well.

If you really mean well for Korea, just go abroad,

and care, understand, do nice things for people.

It's difficult.

I of course know it's a difficult thing.

But that's why a person like that would be respected in any part of the planet.

If you are not really convinced about that,

like, 'Why should I do that to those foreigners?'

'I don't wanna put that efforts'

'I didn't do anything wrong'

Then this is my honest advice.

Just don't go abroad.

Korea is the best place to stay.

I feel so, too.

Why do you have to go abroad then?

Do you really have to go abroad for study?

Foreigners show up on TV and Youtube and say they love Korea so much.

Like, "I love Korean foods more than my own countries' foods."

"Gyeongbokgung is better than anything."

Our brains started to take this kinda things for granted now.

But the reality is different from the mass media.

I don't mean those foreigners lied,

but even if many foreigner came to Korea because they love Korea,

they're often anxious and stressed,

and when they have a chance to talk to the local Koreans, they might need to watch their mouth.

Reversely, imagine we go to Europe.

We go there beause we love it, but still there're stuff we're worried about.

Now when we look at the 'real bread' expressions and flattering about 'French architectures'...

they're just foreign students way younger than me,

and they don't get chances to communicate with the locals,

so it's just meant to relax them a little more.

Complimenting their culture.

Do you really think this is something we need to be that culturally sensitive?

What foreigners say to us the hundreds of time on TV,

and what we all hear on Youtube from foreigners everyday,

all I did was just to return the exact expression only once.

And that's cultural flunkyism?

I completely disagree with that.

I think if you're really confident about your culture, you should rather be able to speak to them with courtesy, being in their shoes,

'cuz that's something a person with no confidence can never do.

Tolerance is the attribute of the strong.

This kinda expression and gestures are so common in our daily lives, you know,

but just because it's the foreigners I'm speaking to, and the subject is culture,

I should refrain from talking like this?

You rather gotta refrain from that attitude.

Let me speak of the fact.

If we become culturally sensitive, it's only us that become isolated.

That's not even meant well for this nation at all.

Some of you really got switched between what brings better recognition about us and what actually isolate us.

Actually, I'm personally kinda proud of our culture.

I'm telling the truth.

Then let's say there's a Youtuber who is NOT.

Why does that matter?

Can't we just freely talk about each other's ideas and perspective?

In my childhood, my family wasn't rich enough to send me to America to study.

But some of my friends experienced studying in US in the early age,

and after that, some of them indeed looked up to the American culture.

Yeah, I envied them.

But I never wanted to be them.

I was born in Masan, Gyeongnam, and went to guys' middle & high school, took KSAT to enter the university, and served in the army.

I didn't get funded for studying abroad, but experienced the world on my own.

To me, this looked way cooler than that.

I'm living the exact life that I used to dream as a kid.

At the same time, when I look back, I'm probably the most localized...

like, I have this confidence on where I came from and who I am.

And I've never lost that a single moment.

Now some of you guys call me culturally flunky just because I speak in their shoes and language.

When I was talking to the French students, there was a part that I didn't mean to say like that in fact.

I admit that some of them wasn't my intention to be honest.

But even if someone actually says that with full intention,

or whether they're actually proud of Korea or not,

why is that a problem?

That's the first thought in my head,

and second,

when I think of many of you following up with my channel,

the reason why you're watching is not because I'm simply making video contents with foreign guests,

but I mean to become real friends, and many of you think it's a special thing.

And maybe some of you are actually thinking of giving it a try.

It's not the language barrier but THIS KINDA barrier that separate us from them.

Whenever I see those people requiring me such patriotism reponsibility just because I'm not trying enough to make Korea look better,

I just get angry for the reasons I said.

You guys like to tell me 'Please be careful 'cuz many people are watching this channel',

and yeah I agree with you.

I've gotta be careful.

That's why I'd rather be clearer on my point.

About what kinda mindset you need to approach foreigners.

But even if I describe it 'How to approach FOREIGNERS',

in the end, it's just the universal mindset of approaching any people on the planet.

Foreigners are no different from us.

Families, friends, and lovers.

I have this belief in any kinds of relationships.

If you try to hold it with force, it'll rather get away.

But this is the only way to build up the relationship.

Understand, care, and make others happy.

That's literally the only answer.

If you don't believe in the stuff I told you today,

you might keep watching me.

There're not foreigners in my videos everyday,

but I won't go anywhere.

For more infomation >> 'Mickey Seo의 사대주의'에 대한 나의 대답 - Duration: 9:37.

-------------------------------------------

The best answer ever to an Christian by Dr zaki naik - Duration: 5:26.

Please subscribe the channel and like the video

Please subscribe the channel and like the video

Please subscribe the channel and like the video

For more infomation >> The best answer ever to an Christian by Dr zaki naik - Duration: 5:26.

-------------------------------------------

O Man .. Answer your Creator - Duration: 3:19.

O mankind , what has deceived you concerning your Lord , the Generous

Who Created you , Proportioned you , and Balanced you ?

O mankind , what has deceived you concerning your Lord , the Generous

Who Created you , Proportioned you , and Balanced you ?

O mankind , what has deceived you concerning your Lord , the Generous

Who Created you , Proportioned you , and Balanced you ?

In whatever form He willed has He assembled you .

O mankind , what has deceived you concerning your Lord , the Generous

Who Created you , Proportioned you , and Balanced you ?

In whatever form He willed has He assembled you .

For more infomation >> O Man .. Answer your Creator - Duration: 3:19.

-------------------------------------------

The moment Cheryl realised violence wasn't the answer - in her own words - Duration: 3:33.

  Cheryl revealed the moment she realised violence wasn't answer to her problems in a candid confession in her 2012 book

 The pop star, 35, opened up about her 2003 assault conviction and declared it is "not acceptable" to lash out physically no matter what the circumstances

 In her autobiography My Story - which is still available in shops - Cheryl revealed she hit a turning point as faced trial for attacking a nightclub toilet attendant in a row over lollies

 She wrote: "Completely out of nowhere, I was hit in the face.  "I swear on my mother's life that's what happened

Read More Greatest Dancer producers 'draft in Strictly Come Dancing pros to boost ratings'  "As the months went on and I prepared for the trial, I started to see that it was not acceptable to have hit her under any circumstances, even in self-defence

"  In October, 2003 Cheryl, who was 20 at the time, was convicted of attacking Sophie Amogbokp at a nightclub in Guildford, Surrey on 11 January

 Sophie, who was left with a severely bruised and swollen face, claimed the star called her a "black b****" and punched her in the face

 The bust-up is said to have happened after Sophie questioned the singer for trying to take a lolly without leaving a tip

 The Girls Aloud star was charged with racially aggravated assault and assault occasioning actual bodily harm

 However, Cheryl claimed she'd only got physical with Sophie in self-defence, and vehemently denied the racism accusations

 She was found guilty of assault occasioning actual bodily harm, but not guilty of the racism charge and Cheryl was sentenced to 120 hours of unpaid community service

 The telly beauty was also ordered to pay Sophie £500 compensation and stump up an addition £3,000 for prosecution costs

Read More Cheryl snaps at Oti Mabuse in tense scenes in The Greatest Dancer  Judge Richard Haworth, who was overseeing the case, told Cheryl in court: "This was an unpleasant piece of drunken violence which caused Sophie Amogbokpa pain and suffering

 "Her eye was painful for three or four weeks, there was bruising for three months and for a while she had blurred vision

 "You showed no remorse whatsoever." Read More Cheryl swaps numbers with Radio One listener after 'sharing a love of roast potatoes'  In a statement issued through her solicitor at the time, Cheryl said: "I'm pleased that the trial is over and thankful that the jury have accepted that this incident had nothing to do with race

 "I'm not a racist, and anyone who knows me knows I would not say anything racist

 "I'm stunned and disappointed by the conviction for assault.  "I would like to thank my family, friends and our fans for their support over this difficult year

"   Do you have a story to sell? Get in touch with us at webcelebs@trinitymirror.com or call us direct 0207 29 33033 Read More Showbiz and TV editor's picks

For more infomation >> The moment Cheryl realised violence wasn't the answer - in her own words - Duration: 3:33.

-------------------------------------------

Clippers have no answer for the Hawks' young duo in 123-118 loss - Duration: 7:42.

On a mid-November night in Atlanta, the Clippers ran toward their locker room laughing at what had just taken place

 They had trailed by 15 points against an Atlanta Hawks team already far from contention, the youthful combination of rookie point guard Trae Young and second-year center John Collins causing the Clippers fits from the start

Advertisement >  Only a furious fourth-quarter rally saved the Clippers, and it was that comeback that left them giddy

 After their latest tangle with the Hawks on Monday night, the Clippers left the court at Staples Center with none of the same joy and their three-game winning streak ended

 Atlanta had answers for the Clippers' fourth-quarter comeback this time. Young scored 26 points, Collins had 22 and strong offensive rebounding in the fourth quarter helped the Hawks to a 123-118 victory

 "I thought they played harder," coach Doc Rivers said. "I thought they came into the game with an intent to win the game

You could feel it. It was impressive to watch, honestly. They were deadly serious about winning this game

 "I thought we showed up and thought we were just going to win."  The defeat was damaging for a Clippers team straddling the line between being a playoff team and watching the postseason from home

 The Hawks (16-33) started the day with the fourth-worst record in the Eastern Conference, but "they looked like a really good team tonight," said Clippers guard Avery Bradley, who finished with 12 points

Clippers' Patrick Beverley gets warning from NBA, praise from coaches By Andrew Greif Jan 28, 2019 | 9:10 PM  Tobias Harris scored a team-high 30 points, his second 30-point performance in his last four games, and had eight rebounds and seven assists, and Lou Williams finished with 21 points despite missing his first 11 shots

 It was the Clippers' fifth game in seven days and, from Rivers' vantage point, they were sluggish from the start

 "I just didn't feel it tonight from our guys," Rivers said. "Should've just kept subbing and subbing and searching

Sometimes you do that, sometimes you let the guys who made the bed try to straighten it out

"  The Hawks entered second in the league in points off paint touches and fifth in the league in three-point attempts per game, and the Clippers wanted to limit their opportunities in both areas

 Harris was whistled quickly for two fouls and held in check for much of the first half

 Meanwhile, Collins and Young flourished from up close and beyond the three-point line

 At one point in the second quarter, they'd combined for 29 points while the five Clippers starters had combined for 20

Advertisement >  "They were spreading us out and just moving the basketball," Bradley said

"We were letting our offense dictate the game for us and we weren't making a lot of shots and weren't getting back and defending on the other end

"  The Clippers scored eight consecutive points to pull within one point with less than four minutes remaining in the second quarter but the Hawks regrouped to score the next six points for a 57-50 lead

 Young was excellent in the first half until the final seconds, when he fouled fellow rookie Jerome Robinson on a buzzer-beating three-point shot that went in

 Robinson missed the free throw but the basket cut the Clippers' deficit to 63-61 after they'd trailed by as many as 12 points

 By the opening minute of the fourth quarter Atlanta's lead had reached 14 points

It was 16 with 6:52 remaining, but down to eight four minutes later after Harris scored on consecutive possessions

 The Clippers trailed by six points when Young missed a three-point shot with 1:30 remaining, but had no chance to get closer

 Dwayne Dedmon grabbed an offensive rebound near the free-throw line, which left Rivers fuming while calling a timeout

He played backup center Montrezl Harrell, an undersized center, the final 19 minutes of the game in place of taller players but said he felt guards contributed to the missed rebounds as much as the frontcourt because so many rebounds were long caroms

 Out of the break, Dedmon dunked with his right hand and roared. After a dunk by Harrell, Young drilled a three-pointer in front of Rivers, the lead now nine and any chance of another startling comeback effectively dead

Sign up for our daily sports newsletter »

For more infomation >> Clippers have no answer for the Hawks' young duo in 123-118 loss - Duration: 7:42.

-------------------------------------------

Chelsea stars have perfect answer to Maurizio Sarri criticism - Duration: 4:37.

 They answered every criticism in the most dramatic fashion.  Maurizio Sarri questioned their motivation, character and determination - and yet Chelsea showed plenty of it at Stamford Bridge

 It was a pulsating, thrilling and superb semi final which ultimately needed a penalty shoot-out to separate the two sides even after 180 entertaining minutes

 But it was Chelsea who had more over the course of the contest and it was little wonder that David Luiz's winning spot kick sparked wild celebrations among the home fans

 Ironically it was Eric Dier, England's penalty shoot-out in the World Cup last summer, who missed one of Tottenham's penalties as ecstasy turned to agony

 But Chelsea were the better side in the second leg, arguably did not deserve to lose at Wembley a fortnight ago and, in fairness, it was only Tottenham's spirit which took it to penalties

 But now Tottenham's season is in serious danger of falling apart as, once again, they fell short of the finishing line and now it is their mentality which will be questioned

 This was Mauricio Pochettino's third successive semi final defeat, they have not won a trophy since 2008 and it never looked more evident that they are missing big players than at Stamford Bridge

 With no Harry Kane, Dele Alli or Heung-Min Son, Tottenham looked toothless at times and woefully short and now Pochettino's patched up squad have to lift themselves for Sunday's FA Cup tie at Crystal Palace

 The season is in the balance with Kane and Alli both out for up to two months, it can quickly go from bad to worse especially if their morale suffers after this latest heartbreak

 Pochettino insisted afterwards he was proud of his players, praising Dier and Lucas Moura for having the guts to take spot kicks even after they missed

 But Pochettino will know in his heart that his squad is running on empty and it was Chelsea who rose to the occasion

 It takes a brave manager to call out the Chelsea dressing room, it has brought down bigger managers in the past, but Sarri is clearly not afraid to follow the same way as Jose Mourinho and Antonio Conte who were forced out even after winning titles

 Sarri even questioned Eden Hazard, insisting he was not a leader, and yet Chelsea and their No10 stood up to be counted when it mattered most

 Straight from the start, Chelsea looked up for it. They harried, chased and closed down Tottenham and it took them just 27 minutes to go ahead

 Hazard's corner was headed clear by Fernando Llorente, the ball reached N'Golo Kante whose shot whistled through the Spurs box, going through Moussa Sissoko's legs and then also going through stand-in keeper Paulo Gazzaniga

 Chelsea had the upper hand and made it two after 38 minutes when Hazard helped start a move, spread the ball wide to Pedro who teamed up with Cesar Azpilicueta whose low cross was turned home by Hazard

Chelsea's No10 may not be Sarri's leader, but he certainly leads by example.  It looked like Tottenham were going out

But they came out ready for a fight in the second half. Substitute Danny Rose was terrific, taking the battle to Chelsea and providing a brilliant cross for Llorente to score and level the tie on aggregate

 The game developed into a thrilling and brutal contest. Spurs refused to give up, Chelsea took it in turns to kick Rose while Olivier Giroud also missed a great chance to score from the outstanding left back Emerson's cross in the dying embers of the game

 It went to penalties and Tottenham went first with Christian Eriksen and Erik Lamela successful from the spot before Dier missed and Lucas had his saved

But Willian, Azpilicueta, Jorginho and then Luiz all held their nerve for Chelsea

 Whoever said the Carabao Cup does not matter anymore, will never understand the rivalry between these two clubs and now the small matter of Manchester City await Chelsea in the final

For more infomation >> Chelsea stars have perfect answer to Maurizio Sarri criticism - Duration: 4:37.

-------------------------------------------

Right Now There Is No Answer To Novak Djokovic - Duration: 6:30.

Photo: Quinn Rooney (Getty) Novak Djokovic heaped pre-match praise on his final Australian Open opponent, because it was a deeply familiar one

"Nadal has historically throughout my life and career been the greatest rival that I ever played against on all the surfaces," he said of their 52-match tug-of-war, which had split 27-25 in his favor

"Some matches that we had against each other were a great turning point in my career

I feel they have made me rethink my game." He's correct, of course. He and Rafael Nadal elevate each other, and the rally itself, to unseen heights

And they seemed ready to do it again. Here in the championship final was that "greatest rival," serving unbreakably, cruising through the draw like he never has on hardcourt, and coming off two full days of rest—and still Djokovic undid him, 6-3, 6-2, 6-3, for his third straight major title

This is Novak Djokovic's world now, and no one, not even his biggest threat, can find the oxygen to live in it

 The stakes might've gotten to Nadal. He looked cagey through the first hour: misfiring on the forehand, fumbling the ball during his sacred pre-toss ritual, settling for a chip return off a mild second serve, even whiffing on a groundstroke

These were all uncharacteristic signs of frazzle from a dude who seemingly burst out of the womb and sprinted right back to the baseline, dialed in to go three sets

Djokovic leapt ahead and won 13 of first 14 points to start out, and the tone of this final didn't materially change after that

 Four minutes into the match, he was leaping and nailing backhand winners. Djokovic took the first set after losing just one point on his serve, coolly absorbing Rafa's best stuff

 How do you get any traction against a guy playing like that? Against 99 percent of the tour, Rafa doesn't need to even ask that question

The answer is clear. Throughout his career, and especially in this tournament, Nadal's forehand has been the bully-ball supreme

With nice pace and demented topspin, it's the epitome of a "heavy" ball—an opponent feels they've been tasked with batting back a watermelon

When playing a righty, Rafa's M.O. is to bludgeon that forehand crosscourt right into the opponent's backhand, typically the weaker wing, to elicit a weak response

But what makes his matchup with Djokovic so remarkable is the fact that the Serb's backhand couldn't have been more better designed to hold up to this abuse

At 6-foot-2 Djokovic has enough height that he's not struggling with the high bounce, the flexibility to hit it cleanly at uncomfortable angles, and a second hand on the racket that affords him some added stability and power

(Compare to Federer, who, aside from that 2017 godly streak when he was able to half-volley everything off his shoelaces, has struggled with Rafa's forehand, bane of the one-hander

) It also helps Djokovic's cause to possess, more broadly, one of the best two-handers ever, and certainly the best ever out of defensive positions, where his Gumby joints let him produce scary pop and depth at the very end of his range

Advertisement As it turned out, Djokovic rarely even had to be on the defensive in this match

The Nadal forehand was a plaything to him. This is how many good shots Rafa would have to line up consecutively to actually break through the defenses and earn a winner of his own, plus a Djokovic thumbs-up of approval: That level proved unsustainable

Rafa lost the second set, too, having won just five points on Djokovic's serve. In the third, he would manage just four more

With no real stress in his service games, confident that he would prevail in any neutral rally, Djokovic started to have a little fun

This is an absolutely unjust response when someone hits a much better drop shot than you: Djokovic hit three drop shots in that game and was looking loose and playful to the end, even head-butting a stray ball in the final game of the match, never veering into his mad-eyed, shirt-yanking mood

Nadal is rarely on the receiving end of such breezy destruction. After the match, a reporter drew a parallel to the straight sets rout that Nadal delivered to Stefanos Tsitsipas in their semifinal

The Spaniard responded with good humor and a lot of honesty: [Tsitsipas] don't have been destroyed enough times to know that that can happen on a tennis court

I am not new on this. I know these kind of things happens. Even to the best players of the history happened

I don't say I have been destroyed. I have been playing against a player that was at the highest level possible, in my opinion, tonight

Advertisement Maybe Djokovic was a player at the highest level possible. Going for 34 winners and nine unforced errors against Rafael Nadal in a major final would seem to satisfy that criteria

Based on what he's done before, though, it certainly feels as if he still has a higher gear

That might not matter if no one on tour is capable of pushing him to it. After claiming his record seventh Australian Open, these hard courts are all his

Later this season, he will come for Rafa's clay, and then Federer's grass. With his total haul of majors rising to 15, those players' sums of 17 and 20 don't feel particularly safe, either

This time last year Djokovic was coming off elbow surgery, staggering through the hard court season, racking up three straight losses

Now he's eaten up three straight majors. Every surface of the earth belongs to Novak Djokovic, all over again

All anyone else can do is wait.

For more infomation >> Right Now There Is No Answer To Novak Djokovic - Duration: 6:30.

-------------------------------------------

Sarah Sanders answer about a pardon for Roger Stone is what mattered Monday Politics - Duration: 1:08.

Sarah Sanders answer about a pardon for Roger Stone is what mattered Monday Politics

She got asked about whether we are headed for another government shutdown she hopes not and why President Trumps clubs employed undocumented workers she cant get into specifics . So, the usual stuff.

The only question and answer that mattered on Monday was when Sanders was asked whether Trump was considering a pardon for the recently indicted Roger Stone.

"Im not aware of that. I havent had any discussions with him on that matter," she responded. Then, when pressed on whether Trump had ruled out the possibility, Sanders said: "Im not going to talk about hypotheticals that are just ridiculous. Im not aware of anybody here ever working with WikiLeaks in any capacity."

Which, if you are keeping track at home, isnt: "No, the President will not pardon Mr. Stone under any circumstances."

Thats not by accident. Stone is a longtime Trump adviser who was allegedly tasked by someone in the Trump campaign known only as a "senior Trump campaign official" in the indictment of Stone to make contact with WikiLeaks during the 2016 campaign and see if he could anticipate the organizations planned releases of hacked emails. Stone is to the charges in his court appearance Tuesday.

Not ruling out a pardon for Stone sends a very clear signal to him: A pardon is on the table. At least for now.

The Point: That is the point. And, trust me, Stone got the message loud and clear.

Không có nhận xét nào:

Đăng nhận xét