Hello Friends
Subscribe to My Channel :)
-------------------------------------------
The Agency's Vision for Inclusive Education Systems - Duration: 1:49.
For more infomation >> The Agency's Vision for Inclusive Education Systems - Duration: 1:49. -------------------------------------------
Learn Colors with My Talking Tom Colours for Kids Animation Education Cartoon Compilation Ep134 - Duration: 3:01.
For more infomation >> Learn Colors with My Talking Tom Colours for Kids Animation Education Cartoon Compilation Ep134 - Duration: 3:01. -------------------------------------------
Learn Colors with My Talking Tom Colours for Kids Animation Education Cartoon Compilation Ep137 - Duration: 2:42.
For more infomation >> Learn Colors with My Talking Tom Colours for Kids Animation Education Cartoon Compilation Ep137 - Duration: 2:42. -------------------------------------------
Learn Colors with My Talking Tom Colours for Kids Animation Education Cartoon Compilation Ep140 - Duration: 2:48.
For more infomation >> Learn Colors with My Talking Tom Colours for Kids Animation Education Cartoon Compilation Ep140 - Duration: 2:48. -------------------------------------------
Episode 1230 | The Line: Education Reforms - Duration: 11:32.
>> WE HAVE GOT MORE OF THAT INTERVIEW ON THE YAZZIE
MARTINEZ LAWSUIT ON THE WEBSITE.
HEAD TO NEWMEXICOINFOCUS.ORG.
WATCH AND LET US KNOW WHAT YOU THINK LAWMAKERS SHOULD
CONSIDER TO FIX OUR EDUCATION SYSTEM.
NOW THAT WE HAVE ALL THAT BACKGROUND I'LL DIVE INTO SOME
OF THE PROPOSALS NOW CIRCULATING THROUGH THE
ROUNDHOUSE.
WE TURN BACK TO THE LINE PANELISTS.
START WITH THE IDEA OF A LONGER SCHOOL YEAR.
ONE PROPOSAL ASKS THREE MORE DAYS OF THE SCHOOL CALENDAR.
THREE DAYS WOULD ALLOW FOR MORE TIME FOR PROFESSIONAL
DEVELOPMENT AND ALSO MORE CLASSROOM INSTRUCTION AS WELL.
BUT, TOM AND IT HAS BEEN SQUISHY ON THE STUDIES OUT
THERE ABOUT THE BENEFITS OF A LONGER SCHOOL YEAR OR NOT.
INTERESTING PROPOSAL.
WE HAVE TO START TRYING SOMETHING, WE ALL KNOW THAT.
CAN'T DO STATUS QUO. IS THIS THE WAY TO GO?
>> I LIKE THE IDEA OF MORE DAYS.
18.7 MILLION TO FUND THOSE THREE EXTRA DAYS, NOT ENTIRELY
A LARGE AMOUNT COMPARED TO THE OVERALL BUDGET.
WHAT IS CONCERNING TO ME IS THAT IT IS A TACTIC WITHOUT A
STRATEGY.
HEY, I KNOW WHAT WE NEED, THREE MORE DAYS, WHAT IS THE
STRATEGY?
WHAT ARE YOU GOING TO DO WITH THAT?
I DON'T KNOW.
WE DON'T HAVE AN EDUCATION SECRETARY YET OR AN EDUCATION
PLAN.
WE JUST GOT RID OF PARCC.
THERE IS A LOT OF STUFF THAT NEEDS TO BE ANSWERED BEFORE WE
CAN GO THROUGH AND HAVE A FURTHER DISCUSSION TO SAY, YOU
KNOW WHAT, ARE THE THREE DAYS REALLY THAT IMPORTANT OR DO WE
NEED TO DO SOMETHING WITH THE OTHER 180 FIRST AS FAR AS
RESTRUCTURING ACCOUNTABILITY FOR PARENTS, ACCOUNTABILITY
FOR STUDENTS AND FOR ADMINISTRATORS AS WELL.
I THINK IT IS THERAPEUTIC.
MAYBE IT IS JUST A LITTLE BIT TOO SOON IN THE CONVERSATION
TO SAY IF IT IS WORTHWHILE BECAUSE YOU DON'T HAVE A
STRATEGY BEHIND IT.
>> INTERESTING POINT.
WHAT DO YOU THINK ABOUT THIS?
>> I THINK THAT THE SCHOOLS ARE UNDERFUNDED.
THE COURT CLEARLY SAID THAT.
THEY EVEN CLAIMED THAT THEY WEREN'T RESPONSIBLE FOR THE
UNDERFUNDING, THAT WAS THE DISTRICTS.
THE JUDGE SAID, NO, YOU ARE RESPONSIBLE AND NOT HAVING THE
MONEY TO DO SOMETHING IS NOT AN EXCUSE.
YOU HAVE GOT TO FIND THE MONEY.
TO TOM'S POINT, ARE WE GOING TO JUST UNDERFUND SCHOOLS FOR
THREE MORE DAYS?
OR ARE WE GOING TO FIGURE OUT WHERE THE MONEY NEEDS TO GO,
PRE-K, ANCILLARY SERVICES, ESL AND SO FORTH, BEFORE WE ADD
MORE DAYS TO UNDERFUND.
I THOUGHT IT WAS INTERESTING THAT THE JUDGE PUT OUT A WHOLE
LIST OF WHERE ARE WE GOING TO GET THE MONEY.
AND, ONE OF THE FIRST -- THE FIRST THING ON THE LIST WAS A
SEVERANCE TAX PERMANENT FUND, TAKE IT OUT OF THERE.
WELL, INTERESTINGLY ENOUGH THE GOVERNOR IN HER STATE OF THE
STATE DIDN'T REALLY MENTION HOW THE EDUCATION CHANGES THAT
WERE MANDATED ARE GOING TO BE FUNDED BUT SHE DID SAY TAKE
SOME MONEY OUT OF THE SEVERANCE TAX PERMANENT FUND
TO FUND SMALL BUSINESS.
WHERE ARE WE GOING TO USE THAT MONEY?
NOW HER PROPOSAL WOULD REQUIRE CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENT
ACTUALLY BECAUSE THERE IS A STATUTORY OR CONSTITUTIONAL
LIMIT ON HOW MUCH CAN BE USED OUT OF THAT FUND FOR SMALL
BUSINESS.
BUT, I JUST THOUGHT IT WAS INTERESTING TO JUXTAPOSE THE
FIRST THING ON THE JUDGE'S LIST WITH WHAT THE GOVERNOR
SAID SHE WOULD DO WITH THAT MONEY.
NOW THE JUDGE SENT 11 MORE TAXES THAT COULD BE EITHER
INVOKED OR REVITALIZED OR JUST RAISED.
ONE WAS TO DO AWAY WITH SOME OF THE RECENT CORPORATE TAX
REDUCTIONS, WHICH I THOUGHT WAS INTERESTING BECAUSE WE
HAVEN'T SEEN ANY GREAT INFLUX OF BUSINESSES COMING IN.
WE HAVE HAD A FEW.
BUT THEY DON'T SEEM TO BE TIED REALLY TO THE TAX STRUCTURE SO
MUCH AS WHAT DO WE HAVE FOR WORKFORCE?
DO WE HAVE AN APPROPRIATE WORKFORCE?
IN THE NETFLIX CASE, WE HAVE INFRASTRUCTURE THEY ARE TAKING
OVER, DIDN'T HAVE VERY MUCH TO DO WITH CORPORATE TAX.
>> A PREEMPTIVE TAKING ALL EXCUSES OFF THE TABLE BEFORE
THE EXCUSES GET TO THE SURFACE.
TEACHERS WILL TALK ABOUT -- MY EX-WIFE IS A TEACHER.
I'VE BEEN AROUND A LOT OF TEACHERS.
PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT IS A BIG DEAL FOR TEACHERS.
AND THEY FEEL LIKE THIS IS PART OF BEING A PROFESSIONAL.
YOU'RE ALWAYS CLIMBING THE LADDER OF KNOWLEDGE IN A
KNOWLEDGE-BASED BUSINESS.
DOES THAT HAVE SWING WITH YOU?
>> I THINK IT PLAYS RIGHT INTO WHAT HAS ALREADY BEEN SAID,
THIS ESSENTIALLY A SYMBOLIC GESTURE AND IT IS AN OLIVE
BRANCH TO THE TEACHERS UNIONS BUT THIS POINT THAT WE HAVE TO
TALK ABOUT REVENUES, IT IS AWKWARD FOR THAT CONVERSATION
TO BE COMING FROM A STATE JUDGE FROM THE JUDICIARY, BUT
THE LEGISLATURE NEEDS TO BE TALKING ABOUT HALF A BILLION
IN SPENDING GOING FORWARD, RECURRING DOLLARS, WHERE THIS
IS GOING TO COME FROM?
IT IS GOING TO COME FROM SOMEWHERE.
MONEY IS FUNGIBLE AND THE MONEY COMES FROM SOMEWHERE.
WE HAVE TO SEE THE GOVERNOR TAKE A POSITION AND SO FAR I
DON'T THINK SHE HAS TAKEN A PUBLIC POSITION, BUT YOU CAN'T
DO ALL THIS ON THE SPENDING SIDE AND NOT TALK ABOUT WHAT
YOU'RE GOING TO DO ON THE REVENUE SIDE.
THERE IS A BIG PUSH AMONG SOME DEMOCRATS TO INCREASE TAXES,
GAS TAX, INCREASE INCOME TAX, TALK ABOUT THE CORPORATE
INCOME TAX.
YOU KNOW.
THEY ARE HAVING THAT CONVERSATION AND THE JOURNAL
HAD GOOD EDITORIAL IN THE LAST COUPLE OF DAYS POINTING OUT,
LET'S JUST LOOK BACK AT THE HISTORY, YOU KNOW.
WE CANNOT CLOSE OUR EYES, BLIND FOLD OURSELVES TO THIS
BOOM AND BUST HISTORY AND IT CAN HAPPEN REALLY FAST.
SO, EVERYBODY SAYS WE ARE AWASH IN MONEY THIS MOMENT AND
WE HAVE TO TALK ABOUT THE REVENUE PICTURE.
>> AS WE SIT HERE TAPING, THE GOVERNOR HAS ANNOUNCED KAREN
TRUJILLO HEAD OF NMSU IS THE NEW SECRETARY OF EDUCATION.
I DON'T KNOW HER OR HER BACKGROUND.
WE'LL GET THAT FIGURED OUT BY THE TIME THE SHOW IS AIRED
ONLY FRIDAY.
WHEN YOU THINK ABOUT THE IDEAS THAT GIVE INDIVIDUAL DISTRICTS
BACK -- THE IDEA OF THE SCHOOL DAYS THING -- THEIR OWN WAY OF
DOING THINGS, SOME LOCALS, SO TO SPEAK.
DOES THAT OPEN A POSSIBILITY THAT WE DON'T HAVE A COHERENT
STRATEGY STATE-WIDE IF WE HAVE DISTRICTS DOING THEIR OWN
THING WITH THIS PROPOSAL OR IS THAT APPROPRIATE?
>> WE HAVE A -- MOST FOLKS KNOW WE HAVE A VERY UNIQUE
PUBLIC EDUCATION SYSTEM IN THE STATE.
FIRST OF ALL THE WAY WE FUND IT IS UNIQUE.
IT IS NOT BASED ON WHAT YOU'RE LOCAL REVENUE BASE AND
PROPERTY TAX IS.
SO EVERY KID, REGARDLESS OF WHERE YOU ARE, GETS THE SAME
AMOUNT OF RESOURCES, EVERY DISTRICT GETS THE SAME AMOUNT
OF RESOURCES.
WE HAVE POOR DISTRICTS WHO IN THEORY WOULD BE GETTING MORE
RESOURCES BECAUSE THEY ARE GETTING THE SAME AMOUNT AS AN
ALBUQUERQUE KID, BUT IT DOESN'T ALWAYS WORK OUT THAT
WAY BECAUSE OF ADMINISTRATIVE COSTS AND SO ON.
SO, I AM A FAN OF LOCAL CONTROL AND I THINK SOME OF
THESE ISSUES ARE SO FUNDAMENTAL AS TO HOW WE
EDUCATE KIDS.
WHETHER IT IS THREE DAYS, FOR MORE PROFESSIONAL DAYS.
I AM A PRODUCT OF ALBUQUERQUE PUBLIC SCHOOLS FOR BETTER OR
WORSE AND MY KIDS ARE IN ALBUQUERQUE PUBLIC SCHOOLS, MY
WIFE WAS AN EDUCATOR.
SO, I HAVE A LOT OF FAMILIARITY WITH KIND OF
REALLY HANDS ON HOW DOES THIS WORK FOR PARENTS AND TEACHERS
AND KIDS.
SO, ANYTHING WE CAN DO TO GIVE TEACHERS AND STUDENTS MORE
ATTENTION, MORE RESOURCES, MORE DEVELOPMENT, I THINK IS A
GOOD THING.
IT MIGHT STINK TO SAY WE HAVE TO SHORTEN PEOPLES' SUMMERS,
BUT IF WE ARE SERIOUS ABOUT FUNDING AND TO MARTHA'S POINT,
YOU HAVE TO FUND IT.
IF YOU'RE SERIOUS ABOUT IT, NOT JUST A TOKEN AMOUNT, LET'S
TAKE SOME OF THIS HALF A BILLION WE ARE TALKING ABOUT
AND REALLY DO IT.
BY THE WAY, ONE OF THE GOVERNOR'S PROPOSAL, K-5 PLUS
TARGETED TO KIDS OUTSIDE OF THE NORMAL SCHOOL YEAR, RIGHT,
TO HELP THIS VERY SMALL NUMBER OF KIDS, THIS ESSENTIALLY
WOULD TAKE A COUPLE OF DAYS AND TRY TO HELP ALL KIDS.
THERE IS ALWAYS A CHANCE YOU DO IT UNIVERSALLY OR FOR NEW
MEXICO'S NEEDIEST KIDS, WHICH IS AT THE CENTER POINT OF THE
YAZZI CASE; RIGHT.
>> I THINK IT IS ABSOLUTELY RIGHT BUT WHEN ERIC SAYS
ANYTHING WE CAN DO, WE CAN'T DO ANYTHING AND EVERYTHING.
SO, SOME OF THESE REALLY CRITICAL NEEDS THAT WERE
RAISED IN THE LAWSUIT, TEXTBOOKS THAT ARE CURRENT
WITHIN 10 YEARS.
SO WE HAVE TO PRIORITIZE AND CAN'T THROW MONEY AT
EVERYTHING.
IT IS ALREADY SPENT.
>> STAY WITH YOU JUSTINE, THE IDEA OF CAPITAL CHARTER
SCHOOLS.
IS YOUR CHILD IN A CHARTER SCHOOL.
[MULTIPLE VOICES] >> HE IS PRECOCIOUS.
>> I AM SURE HE IS VERY BRIGHT BUT --
>> IT IS BLACK AND WHITE.
YOU'RE EITHER ALL IN OR YOU ARE NOT.
YOU BELIEVE THAT CHARTER SCHOOLS WORK AND THEY HELP
CREATE, YOU KNOW, THEY HELP WITH CREATIVITY AND GIVE
FAMILIES CHOICE AND IMPROVE THE SCHOOL SYSTEM OR YOU
DON'T. AND I THINK A LOT OF PEOPLE
ARE THREATENED BY THE CHARTER SCHOOLS, YOU KNOW, OTHER
SCHOOLS ARE GOING TO FAIL.
I TOTALLY OPPOSE THE CAPS.
I THINK IF WE HAVE THEM, WE HAVE THEM.
>> THE THING ABOUT 27,000 ABOUT 1000 MORE THAN WE HAVE
ENROLLED IN CHARTER SCHOOLS NOW.
INTERESTING TO PUT A NUMBER ON A CAP ALREADY, BUT YOUR SENSE
OF IT RIGHT OFF THE TOP.
>> I THINK WHAT HAPPENED IN CALIFORNIA THIS PAST WEEK IS
INFORMATIVE.
THEY SETTLED THE STRIKE, THE CALIFORNIA -- THE SCHOOL BOARD
IN LA UNIFIED IS ACTUALLY PRO CHARTER, BUT PART OF THE
SETTLEMENT WITH THE TEACHERS UNION, THEY NOW HAVE TO VOTE
ON WHETHER TO PUT A CAP OR KEEP A CAP IN CALIFORNIA.
BUT INTERESTINGLY, THEY SAID, THIS SETTLEMENT IS A MOVE BACK
TO COMMUNITY SCHOOLS AND AWAY FROM CHARTERS BECAUSE THE LINE
HAS ALWAYS BEEN THAT CHARTERS ARE BETTER ALL THE WAY AROUND
AND KIDS ARE GETTING SHORTCHANGED IN THE PUBLIC
SCHOOLS.
LET'S LOOK AT THE NUMBERS HERE ONCE AGAIN.
IN NEW MEXICO THE PUBLIC SCHOOL -- CHARTERS ARE 8% OF
NEW MEXICO PUBLIC SCHOOL STUDENTS AND THEY GET 55% OF
THE FUNDING.
>> CHARTER SCHOOLS IS A GOOD CONCEPT.
I AM OKAY WITH CAPPING THEM BECAUSE YOU JUST NEED TO
READDRESS THE WHOLE SYSTEM.
THERE IS COLOSSAL SUCCESSES AND FAILURES WITH CHARTER
SCHOOLS.
LET'S PUT THE BRAKES ON, LET THOSE WHO ARE GOOD SURVIVE AND
EXCEED, AND THOSE WHO DON'T LET THE NATURAL PROGRESS TAKE
CARE OF THEM.
>> 30 SECONDS.
THE YAZZI MARTINEZ CASE AND CHARTER SCHOOLS, SORT OF ANY
IMPACT THERE?
>> ABSOLUTELY.
THE FOLKS -- I HAVE BEEN WHERE THEY WORK, I DON'T THINK IT IS
BLACK AND WHITE.
THERE ARE GREAT CHARTER SCHOOLS THAT ADDRESS THE VERY
KIDS THAT YAZZI IS TALKING ABOUT.
THE NATIVE AMERICAN CHARTER ACADEMY IS A NATIONAL MODEL.
SOUTH VALLEY ACADEMY, IMMIGRANT KIDS, SAME KIDS IN
THE LAWSUIT, HAVE DONE A GOOD JOB.
OTHER CHARTER SCHOOLS DISASTROUS, MISMANAGED.
CORRUPT.
YOU CAN TALK ABOUT THEM TOGETHER BUT THE CENTRAL ISSUE
IS DO THEY REALLY COMPETE FOR FUNDING WITH PUBLIC SCHOOLS?
THE CORPORATE SORT OF CHAIN CHARTER SCHOOLS, THE
MCDONALD'S OF CHARTER SCHOOLS, WE HAVE TO REGULATE THOSE BUT
TO SAY WE ARE GOING TO GO AFTER SCHOOLS LIKE NACA, AND
SOUTH VALLEY ACADEMY THAT ARE DOING REALLY GREAT WORK WITH
THE VERY KIDS YAZZI IS TALKING ABOUT, I THINK, IS MISTAKE.
>> WE WANT TO KNOW WHAT YOU THINK ABOUT THE PROPOSED
EDUCATION REFORM.
DROP US A LINE AT NEWMEXICOINFOCUS.ORG OR JOIN
OUR FACEBOOK GROUP, FOCUS ON NEW MEXICO.
WE WOULD LOVE TO HEAR FROM YOU.
-------------------------------------------
2019 Children's Education Concert - Duration: 1:00.
For more infomation >> 2019 Children's Education Concert - Duration: 1:00. -------------------------------------------
Learn Colors with My Talking Tom Colours for Kids Animation Education Cartoon Compilation Ep136 - Duration: 2:26.
For more infomation >> Learn Colors with My Talking Tom Colours for Kids Animation Education Cartoon Compilation Ep136 - Duration: 2:26. -------------------------------------------
Learn Colors with My Talking Tom Colours for Kids Animation Education Cartoon Compilation Ep141 - Duration: 2:50.
For more infomation >> Learn Colors with My Talking Tom Colours for Kids Animation Education Cartoon Compilation Ep141 - Duration: 2:50. -------------------------------------------
Learn Colors with My Talking Tom Colours for Kids Animation Education Cartoon Compilation Ep139 - Duration: 3:01.
For more infomation >> Learn Colors with My Talking Tom Colours for Kids Animation Education Cartoon Compilation Ep139 - Duration: 3:01. -------------------------------------------
US Department of Education Reduces UM Clery Fine - Duration: 0:53.
For more infomation >> US Department of Education Reduces UM Clery Fine - Duration: 0:53. -------------------------------------------
Episode 1230 | Education Lawsuit Refresher - Duration: 10:45.
>> EDUCATION REFORM IS A TOP PRIORITY FOR LAWMAKERS THIS
YEAR AS THEY FACE A JUDGE'S APRIL DEADLINE TO PRESENT A
PLAN TO MAKE MASSIVE CHANGES TO THE ENTIRE SCHOOL SYSTEM.
JUDGE SINGLETON ISSUED THAT DEADLINE LAST YEAR AFTER
RULING THE STATE HAD FAILED ITS CONSTITUTIONAL OBLIGATION
TO OFFER A QUALITY EDUCATION TO ALL STUDENTS, INCLUDING
THOSE MOST AT RISK.
NOW, AS WE CONTINUE TO FOLLOW THE PROPOSALS, WE WANTED TO
LOOK BACK ON EXACTLY WHAT JUDGE SINGLETON FOUND AND WHY
WE ARE IN THE POSITION WE ARE IN RIGHT NOW.
NEW MEXICO IN FOCUS SPECIAL CORRESPONDENT SARAH GUSTAVUS
DOWN WITH ONE OF THE PLAINTIFFS IN THAT COURT CASE,
WILHEMENA YAZZI AS WELL AS THE LAWYER FROM CENTER ON LAW AND
POVERTY.
THIS IS A SAMPLE OF WHAT MS.
YAZZI'S EXPERIENCE WAS AND WHY SHE DECIDED TIME FOR DRASTIC
CHANGE IS NOW.
>> WILHEMENA, I WANT TO START WITH YOU.
YOUR SON WAS IN MIDDLE SCHOOL IN GALLUP WHEN THE LAWSUIT
STARTED.
WHAT CONCERNS DID YOU HAVE ABOUT THE QUALITY OF EDUCATION
HE WAS RECEIVING?
>> ACTUALLY, HE WAS ELEMENTARY.
>> WHEN IT STARTED.
>> AS A CONCERNED PARENT, MY CHILD AT THE TIME I FELT LIKE
HE WASN'T RECEIVING THE ADEQUATE AND SUFFICIENT
RESOURCES THAT HE NEEDED IN ORDER FOR HIM TO BE SUCCESSFUL
AND ESPECIALLY THROUGH MIDDLE SCHOOL AND HIGH SCHOOL.
I WANTED HIM TO BE COLLEGE READY, BE PREPARED FOR LIFE
OUTSIDE WHEN HE GETS OLDER.
AS A NATIVE AMERICAN, NAVAJO, WE CONSIDER OUR CHILDREN
SACRED AND THAT IS ONE OF OUR PRIMARY RESPONSIBILITIES TO
OUR CHILDREN IS THAT WE MAKE SURE THAT WE TEACH THEM THE
CORRECT, YOU KNOW, PRINCIPLES OF LIFE AND ALSO TO PROTECT
THEM.
THAT IS OUR PRIMARY RESPONSIBILITIES FOR OUR
CHILDREN.
THAT IS WHY I HAD SOME CONCERNS WITHIN THE SCHOOLS
THAT HE WAS ATTENDING, TO MAKE SURE THAT HE RECEIVED THE
QUALITY EDUCATION THAT HE WAS ENTITLED TO.
>> WERE YOU CONCERNED EVEN IN ELEMENTARY SCHOOL THAT HE WAS
FALLING BEHIND?
>> HE WAS ACTUALLY DOING WELL, GETTING GOOD GRADES AND DOING
VERY WELL, BUT THEN WHEN IT CAME TO TESTING, HE FELL BELOW
THE PASSING GRADE LEVEL.
AND THAT WAS A LITTLE, YOU KNOW, CONCERNING FOR ME,
BECAUSE HE WAS DOING REALLY GOOD BUT WHEN IT CAME TO
TESTING -- HE WAS DOING SO GOOD AND HE WASN'T WHERE HE
WAS SUPPOSED TO BE AT.
THAT WAS A BIG FLAG AND THINKING WHAT IS IT THAT HE
NEEDS IN ORDER FOR HIM TO GET PAST THE TESTING.
SO, MORE RESOURCES HE'LL NEED AND ALSO WITH OUR CULTURAL,
WITH THE CULTURAL, YOU KNOW, RELEVANT LEARNING ENVIRONMENT
THAT HE NEEDS WITH THE LANGUAGE THAT WE SPEAK AT
HOME, OF COURSE, YOU KNOW, AND THOSE KINDS OF BARRIERS THAT
HE NEEDS TO BE ASSISTED WITH, I GUESS.
>> DID YOU FEEL ENCOURAGED WHEN YOU WENT TO TALK ABOUT
YOUR SON'S EDUCATION.
>> SEVERAL TIMES -- I HAVE ALWAYS GONE TO THE PARENT
TEACHER CONFERENCES.
THAT IS ONE THING I WANTED TO GO TO TO MAKE SURE MY SON WAS
DOING WHAT HE WAS SUPPOSED TO BE DOING, BEHAVIOR WISE AND
EDUCATION AND ACADEMIC WISE, THAT HE WAS PASSING, DOING
WHAT HE WAS SUPPOSED TO BE DOING AND SO FORTH.
AT ONE POINT MY SON WAS DOING VERY GOOD, GETTING GOOD
GRADES, HONOR ROLE AND I WAS KIND OF CONCERNED THAT HE
WASN'T PLACED IN LIKE MORE ADVANCED CLASSES.
SO, I BROUGHT THAT UP TO ONE OF THE COUNSELORS, YOU KNOW,
HOW DOES A CHILD OR HOW DO YOU DETERMINE HOW THEY GET TO
ADVANCED CLASS?
I DIDN'T REALLY GET ANY CHANCES.
THERE WAS BASICALLY, WELL, WE LOOK AT THE CHILD'S GRADES AND
WE LOOK AT THE TESTING AND IT WAS A BIT CONFUSING FOR ME BUT
I LEFT IT AT THAT AND THOUGHT, YOU KNOW, XAVIER, ALWAYS DO
YOUR BEST, ANYWAY, JUST KEEP DOING YOUR BEST.
AND OTHER CONCERNS THAT I HAD WAS HE WASN'T ABLE TO BRING
ANY TEXTBOOKS HOME FROM SCHOOL TO DO HOMEWORK, AND, OF
COURSE, THEY ALWAYS HAD HOMEWORK.
HE SHARED TEXTBOOKS.
SOMETIMES SOME OF THE INSTRUCTORS OR TEACHERS WERE
NICE ENOUGH TO MAKE COPIES, MAYBE ON THEIR OWN, OF CERTAIN
SECTIONS THAT THEY ARE COVERING.
THAT WAS HELPFUL.
OTHER THINGS, I SAW WAS MAYBE IN TECHNOLOGY, LIMITED
TECHNOLOGY AND IT'S NOT JUST FOR MY SON, IT IS ACTUALLY FOR
LIKE OTHER CHILDREN IN OUR COMMUNITY, IN THE STATE, IN
THE NATION, ESPECIALLY THOSE THAT ARE GOING TO SCHOOL IN
THE RURAL AREAS.
THEY HAVE VERY LIMITED ACCESS TO A LOT OF THE RESOURCES THAT
MY SON HAD IN THE BIGGER TOWNS.
THAT WAS SOMETHING -- I HAVE FAMILY AND FRIENDS THAT HAVE
CHILDREN THAT GO TO RURAL AREA SCHOOLS AND THE SAME THING,
LIMITED TEXTBOOKS, MATERIALS, AND THEN WITH THE TECHNOLOGY,
YOU KNOW, IMPROVING AND ALL THAT THEY HAD LIMITED ACCESS
TO WIFI, THINGS LIKE THAT.
SO THAT WAS, YOU KNOW, SOME CONCERNS THAT I HAD WITH
XAVIER AND MOST IMPORTANTLY WAS JUST BASICALLY MAKING SURE
THAT HE IS PREPARED WHEN HE GETS OUT OF HIGH SCHOOL, THAT
HE HOPEFULLY GRADUATES, BECAUSE YOU KNOW WITH THIS
TESTING WITH HIM GOING BELOW THE GRADE LEVEL, IT IS A BIT
CONCERNING.
AND I WANT HIM TO PASS AND TO GRADUATE AND I WANT HIM TO GET
TO COLLEGE.
AND MY SON HAS DREAMS, YOU KNOW.
HE HAS BIG DREAMS.
HE WANTS TO GO TO A BIG COLLEGE, WANTS A CAREER, WANTS
TO DO THIS AND THAT, YOU KNOW, AND I THINK, YOU KNOW, WITHIN
OUR CULTURE, EDUCATION IS A VERY IMPORTANT THING SO THAT
IS PRETTY MUCH IT.
>> WHEN DID YOU DECIDE TO BE PART OF THIS LAWSUIT?
>> THOSE ARE THE CONCERNS I HAVE.
EVERY OTHER CHILD IN OUR STATE AND COMMUNITY ESPECIALLY US IN
THE NATIVE AMERICAN, ANOTHER THING THAT PUSHED ME WAS MY
MOM WAS AN EDUCATOR FOR 30 PLUS YEARS.
SHE WAS TEACHER AND EDUCATION WAS ONE OF THE MOST IMPORTANT
THINGS IN THE FAMILY.
SHE PUSHED ME AND THE SIBLING TO GO TO SCHOOL, GET YOUR
EDUCATION.
AND DURING MY SCHOOL YEARS, WE WERE VERY LIMITED, YOU KNOW, I
EXPERIENCED THAT AND I KNOW HOW THAT IS.
SO, EDUCATION IS ONE OF THE MOST IMPORTANT.
ANOTHER THING IS, YOU KNOW, WITH OUR CULTURE AND HISTORY,
ONE OF THE GREAT WARRIORS HAD TOLD US, I DON'T KNOW IF IT IS
PRECISELY RIGHT BUT, MY GRANDCHILDREN GO OUT AND CLIMB
THE LADDER OF EDUCATION.
SUCCEED SO YOU CAN COME BACK AND HELP OUR PEOPLE, HELP OUR
NATION.
THAT WAS ONE THING THAT WAS SET IN OUR FAMILY, WAS THAT
EDUCATION WAS VERY IMPORTANT.
SO, THAT IS WHY I BECAME A PLAINTIFF IN THIS SUIT.
MY SON DESERVES THE QUALITY EDUCATION THAT HE NEEDS IN
ORDER TO SUCCEED.
>> ABSOLUTELY.
>> THIS LAWSUIT IS ACTUALLY TWO COMBINED LAWSUITS THAT THE
JUDGE RULED ON, INCLUDING NATIVE AMERICAN STUDENTS AND
ALSO ECONOMIC DISADVANTAGED STUDENTS, ENGLISH LANGUAGE
LEARNERS, STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES.
THAT SEEMS VERY BROAD.
WHAT DOES THAT MEAN FROM A -- IN A LAWSUIT LIKE THAT, WAS
THAT AN ADDITIONAL CHALLENGE TO INCLUDE SO MANY STUDENTS?
>> WELL, YOU KNOW, SO THE TAKE THAT WE HAD, OUR POSITION IN
THIS CASE IS THAT ALL STUDENTS HAVE THE POTENTIAL TO LEARN,
ALL STUDENTS HAVE THE POTENTIAL TO LEARN AND IT IS
JUST AS GREAT IN TERMS OF POTENTIAL AS OTHER STATES, AS
OTHER NATIONS.
AND SO, THE THING THAT IS HAPPENING HERE IN NEW MEXICO,
THOUGH, IS THAT THEY ARE STARVED FOR RESOURCES, STARVED
WITH EDUCATIONAL OPPORTUNITIES TO SUCCEED ACADEMICALLY AS
WILHEMENA HAS DESCRIBED, AND SO PUTTING TOGETHER THIS CASE
MEANT THAT WE HAD TO SORT OF THINK ABOUT THE NEEDS OF ALL
STUDENTS.
AND, THE STUDENTS -- STUDENTS HAVE DIFFERENT NEEDS.
ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS HAVE NEEDS WHEN IT COMES TO ENGLISH
LANGUAGE ACQUISITION PROGRAMS, ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
STUDENTS HAVE NEEDS AROUND SOCIO-EMOTIONAL CAREER
COUNSELING KIND OF NEEDS AND THEN AMERICAN INDIAN STUDENTS
AS WELL SHARE A HISTORY OF DISCRIMINATION BY EDUCATION
SYSTEMS THAT HAS TO BE ADDRESSED THROUGH THE
EDUCATION SYSTEM TODAY.
SO WE SOUGHT TO CAPTURE ALL OF THOSE NEEDS AS WELL AS JUST
GENERAL NEEDS OF PUBLIC SCHOOL DISTRICTS IN NEW MEXICO.
>> WILHEMENA MENTIONED A LACK OF TEXTBOOKS.
THE ACTUAL MATERIALS THAT THE STATE NEEDS TO PROVIDE MORE
FUNDING FOR TEXTBOOKS, TECHNOLOGY, COMPUTERS THINGS
LIKE THAT.
>> RIGHT.
>> WHAT ABOUT CULTURE IN THE CLASSROOM.
I THINK THAT IS IMPORTANT.
WE TALKED ABOUT THAT HERE IN NEW MEXICO IN FOCUS, MAKING
THINGS MORE APPROPRIATE IN THE CLASSROOMS FOR STUDENTS.
HOW DOES THE LAWSUIT SPEAK TO THAT?
>> GOOD QUESTION.
SO THE COURT IN ITS OPINION HAS STATED SPECIFICALLY FOR
NATIVE AMERICAN COMPLIANCE WITH THE NEW MEXICO INDIAN
EDUCATION ACT IS A CONSTITUTIONAL REQUIREMENT.
A VIOLATION OF THE NEW MEXICO INDIAN EDUCATION ACT IS A
VIOLATION OF THE CONSTITUTIONAL CLAUSE.
THAT IS HUGE FOR NEW MEXICO STUDENTS, HUGE FOR NATIVE
AMERICAN STUDENTS.
BECAUSE IF YOU LOOK AT THE LAW ITSELF, IT REQUIRES A
CULTURALLY RELEVANT AND CULTURALLY RESPONSIVE
EDUCATION, SPECIFICALLY FOR THE DISTRICT THAT SERVE
HIGHEST POPULATIONS OF AMERICAN INDIAN STUDENTS.
SO, THAT IS ONE ELEMENT OF THIS CASE IS COMPLIANCE WITH
THAT LAW, BUT THE COURT IS ALSO ADDRESSING ITS OPINION ON
THE HISPANIC EDUCATION ACT, THE BILINGUAL MULTICULTURAL
EDUCATION ACT.
THESE ARE ALL LAWS THAT PROVIDE GOALS FOR STUDENTS IN
TERMS OF WHAT THEY SHOULD BE ACHIEVING ACADEMICALLY, AS
WELL AS CULTURALLY, AND THESE ARE ALL NOW A PART OF THIS
EQUATION AND SO WE SEEK TO ENSURE THESE LAWS ARE BEING
COMPLIED WITH.
Không có nhận xét nào:
Đăng nhận xét