Thứ Hai, 29 tháng 10, 2018

Auto news on Youtube Oct 29 2018

What should you do when the stock market crashes?

Stock market crashes can be some of the hardest times to be an investor especially if you're

just starting out.

If you haven't been investing for very long it can be pretty scary seeing your Investments

go down by 20%, 30%, 40%, or even over 50% in the span of just a few short months.

Earlier on this channel, I did a video going over many of the major stock market crashes

of the past 50 or so years.

I went over how big of a hit the market actually took, as well as how long it took for the

market to recover its previous high.

I then extrapolated that information and discussed what would happen to someone's net worth if

they sold their investments when the market crashed compared to if they just stopped investing

during the fall and even if they kept investing the same amount or more during the crisis.

And in that video, we found out that most Market crashes don't last more than 2 or 3

years (obviously there were exceptions such as the dot-com bubble or the housing crisis

but most were not that long or that bad).

We also found out that continuing to invest as much as you were prior to the crash or

even more could have a pretty significant effect on your net worth as compared to stopping

investing during the fall or even worse selling your Investments.

However, one angle that I didn't really touch on that I kind of wish I did was how much

faster someone could recover their personal net worths during market crashes in comparison

to the stock market itself.

So I'm going to touch on that angle in this video.

Today we're going to see how long it takes an individual's net worth to recover from

various stock market crashes using the S&P 500 as an example.

I'm going to be looking at scenarios where the individual was investing one year prior

to the crash as well as 5 years 10 years and 20 years prior to the fall and show how even

though it might take the stock market say 7 or so years to recover from a crash like

the S&P 500 did during the dot-com bubble it doesn't actually take that long for the

individual to recover from that same crash assuming they keep investing.

Hey everyone Daniel here and welcome to Next Level Life a channel where you can learn about

Investing, debt, retirement, and many other general financial education videos because

the school's aren't going to do it for us.

So if any of those topics sound interesting to you or if you want to learn how to better

handle your money and have more financial freedom be sure to hit that subscribe button

and the bell next to my name to be notified every time I upload a video.

And if you want to further support the growth of this channel you can check out some of

the links I've left down in the description below which includes a 30-day free trial of

Audible and a list of some books on money I'd recommend checking out, or you can share

this video with a friend, and leave a comment below letting me know what topics you'd

like me to cover in future videos.

So as you can tell this video is going to be of the longer variety and in the interest

of keeping this under 20 minutes, I'm only going to be looking at three major stock market

crashes.

The crashes I'm going to be looking at are the crash of the 1970's, the dot-com bubble,

and of course the housing crisis.

I chose these three crashes specifically because the max drop from the market's peak to its

low point during the crash was over 45% in all cases, so statistically, they are among

the worst in our stock markets history.

My hope is that by using specifically these three crashes as examples, in combination

with the knowledge that we gained from my previous stock market crash video, we will

be able to invest more confidently even during less-than-ideal times because we know that

we can recover from any crash.

So without further adieu, let's get started.

The crash of the 1970's began in December of 1972 when the S&P 500 reached a peak of

$118.05 before dropping to a low of $63.54 in September of 1974.

That was a total drop of about 46.2% and it would take the market nearly another 6 years

to fully recover and set a new record high of $121.67 in July of 1980.

In total, this Market cycle lasted for about 91 months, or 7 years and 7 months but how

much of a difference could an individual make if they continued investing during the crisis?

Let's take John, for example, he starts investing $500 a month and decide that he will continue

investing that $500 a month regardless of what the market does.

If he began investing in December of 1971 or one year before the start of the crash.

By the end of his first year of investing due to the market slowly creeping up, he has

a net worth of $6,461.87.

That's when the market begins to tank.

However, John doesn't really notice this, not because he's not paying any attention

to what the markets doing, because he is even though he's not letting it affect his investing,

but because his net worth is actually by and large still going up.

At the end of his second year of investing he has a net worth of $10,649.71.

This trend continues for another 7 months where John reaches what then was an all-time

high net worth of $12,803.65.

At that point, the markets drops finally catch up with him and his net worth over the next

3 months drops from over $12,800 to $10,800, or about 15%.

Now losing $2,000 off your net worth over the course of 3 months is not necessarily

an ideal situation but considering that the S&P 500 is itself down 46.2% since the start

of the crash and John's net worth has gone up since the start of the crash from almost

$6,500 to $10,800 he's not doing half bad.

As a matter of fact, he's up about 67% as an individual despite the crash.

He'd certainly be up even more if the market had continued to grow, but considering the

circumstances and the fact that it only took 4 months before John's net worth was once

again above $12,800, he's doing alright.

And of course as it always does, the market itself eventually recovers and John's net

worth continues growing, but now at an even faster pace.

By the time the market fully recovers in July of 1980, about 8.5 years after John began

investing he has a net worth of $64,825.

Which means that in the 8 years and 7 months that he's been investing, John's average

rate of return has been about 5.25% which doesn't sound that great, but keep in mind

that's his rate of return during a major market crash.

We haven't taken into account any bull market's that may have come afterward.

We just had him start investing a year before the crash (so he was buying at basically the

highest point of the market) and until the market got back to where it was before the

start of the crash.

That's it.

During that same span, the market gains very little, if anything, while John only sees

a temporary 15% drop in his investments which disappears completely in 4 months and he still

earns 5.25%.

Those are the things to keep in mind here.

But while it is nice to know that we're less likely to personally feel the brunt of a market

crash if we haven't been investing for very long obviously the numbers do change a bit

if we have been investing for a while.

Let's say John had been investing for five full years before the start of the crash.

What would the numbers have looked like then?

Well, we would see that John has a $37,300 net worth when the market hits its peak, which

actually ends up rising to about $39,200 due to the fact that the market didn't drop

like a rock right away in this particular crash.

However, when the bottom really did fall out of the market his investment's net worth

dropped from that $39,200 net worth down to just over $27,000 in 11 months.

It was a 31% drop and John wouldn't personally recover from it for another 7 months.

Meaning that the cycle starting from when the market reached its peak to when John himself

recovered took 18 months or about a year-and-a-half to complete.

When the market fully recovered in July of 1980 John's net worth was just over $96,000.

So, again during that time span, the market gains very little, if anything and John's

sees a temporary 31% drop in his investments, which is big don't get me wrong but not

nearly as big as the 46% drop the market experienced, and it disappears completely in 7 months and

he still earns 3.75% per year during one of the worst crashes in the stock market's

history.

And of course, that's not counting the bull market that followed this crash which saw

the S&P 500 reach a value of about $330 per share, which is over 2.5x the value of the

market in 1980, before the flash crash of 1987, which lasted less than 2 years.

Anyway, the percentages weren't as good as in the previous example where John only

started investing 1-year before the start of the crash but that makes sense, right?

If you had been investing $1,000 per year and buying 10 shares of stock worth $100 each

for 20 years... your 200 shares would be worth $20,000.

Then if the market crashes and your investments go down by 50% the next year you would still

invest your $1,000 but this time you would buy 20 shares of the stock since it is now

worth $50 per share and your net worth at the end of the year would be $11,000.

Meaning your net worth is down by 45% since before the crash.

However, if you had been investing the same $1,000 per year into the same $100 stock but

for only one year, you would only have 10 shares before the start of the crash and those

shares would be worth $1,000.

Then the market drops 50% and you invest your $1,000 and buy 20 shares at $50 per share

which gives you a total of 30 shares worth $50 each or an investment net worth of $1,500.

So you're up 50% year-on-year, despite the crash because you're buying low while the

investment is effectively on sale and because the amount your investing, in this case, the

$1,000 per year, is still a sizeable percentage of your net worth.

And we see this mathematical phenomenon play out in each scenario, with the largest percentage

drops in John's personal net worth getting closer and closer to what the market actually

dropped, but never quite getting there because he's recovering some of his losses by buying

more shares when the market is low and the time to recovering his personal net worth

getting longer and longer, but again not ever becoming quite as long as it took for the

market itself to recover.

In fact, in the crash of the 1970's, even when John had been investing for 20 years

before the crash started, he still only takes 48 months or 4 years to recover his personal

net worth compared to the 91 months that it took the market to recover.

And we see this pattern continue into the Dot-Com Crash.

The Dot-Com crash began in August of 2000 when the S&P 500 reached a peak of $1,517.68

after a phenomenal run through the 1990's before dropping to a low of $815.28 in September

of 2002.

That was a total drop of about 46.3% and it would take the market nearly another 5 years

to fully recover and set a new record high of $1,530.62 in May of 2007, not that it ended

up lasting long as we now know.

In total, this Market cycle lasted for 81 months or about 6 years and 9 months but the

numbers for John look fairly similar, if not a little better than they did during the crash

of the 1970's.

As you can see the months to recovering his personal net worth are a little longer during

the Dot-Com crash, in part because it took quite a bit longer for the market to reach

its lowest point than it did in the 1970's, but compared to the crash of the 1970's

it was a much slower climb back to the top of the market.

For instance, once the market got to the point where it lost 40% of its value, it took 9

full months to get back below that 40% loss mark and another 7 months to get past the

30% loss mark.

The point I'm trying to make here is that once we got to the low point of the market

during the Dot-Com crash, we stayed pretty close to it for a long time!

That means that we had many opportunities to buy our investments when they were on a

huge sale and that's why you see such a big difference in the net worth figures at

the point when the market recovers during this crash compared to the crash of the 1970's

and also as you can see on your screen now, the housing crisis.

The housing crisis or the great recession began in October of 2007 when the S&P 500

reached a peak of $1,549.38 before dropping to a low of $735.09 in February of 2009.

That was a total drop of about 52.6% and it would take the market another 4 years and

1 month to fully recover and set a new record high of $1,569.19 in March of 2013, which

has been the bull market that we have basically been riding ever since.

In total, this Market cycle lasted for about 5 years and 5 months and as it turns out,

it performed much like the crash of the 1970's when it comes to the numbers, just with a

bigger drop from the top of the market to the bottom and a shorter cycle of recovery.

As a result, the numbers look pretty similar.

WHAT YOU CAN DO: But that's kind of the point, isn't it?

We've already covered how most market crashes don't last much more than a few years, but

as we see now, even the ones that do can be managed to a certain degree, by just staying

the course and continuing to invest.

This is especially true if you've only recently started to invest, or even if you've just

now started to invest.

So it's October 26th as I'm recording this audio and the market has been stumbling

for most of October with the S&P 500 being down nearly 10% from it's all-time high

that was set in late September and on the off-chance that the market does experience

a crash in the near future I figured it would be good to have this video in my log as a

follow up to the last one to help remind us that even in the bad times we can do fairly

well.

After all, as I said, when the stock market crashes it's like we're buying everything

on sale and when the time comes that things aren't on sale anymore we'll see our net

worths skyrocket.

That's the takeaway I want you guys to get from this.

From an investing perspective, stock market crashes are not a bad thing.

And don't ever let the fear of one happening keep you from investing in the first place.

Really the worst thing that could happen to you during a stock market crash is losing

your job and not being able to get another one.

And if that's something that worries you, I know, believe me, I've been there, then

there are a few things that you can do.

First is to obviously build up your emergency fund, another, like we discovered in my last

video on these market crashes is to invest more into the market during crashes while

you still can, but yet another option that not enough people take advantage of I feel

is to diversify your income streams.

Now, I don't know if that's just because people aren't sure how to do it or if they

just feel that they don't have the time to do it or what the reason is, but I would

highly recommend looking into it.

Heck, I could even start making videos on the subject, I've been working on diversifying

my revenue streams for nearly the past 2 years now and it's really taken a lot of stress

off my shoulders and I think that it could for lots of other people as well.

I mean, even an extra $100 or $200 a month could really help speed up our abilities to

pay off debt, or invest and retire early, or even just have some extra fun money.

Would that be something that you guys would be interested in?

It obviously wouldn't replace these finance videos, I'd still do these like normal,

but I could do the other videos in addition to the regular content and I think that it

would help round out the channel because thus far I've only really focused on one side

of the financial equation which is the side where you're saving money through paying

off debt and budgeting, but there are two sides to the equation.

There's finding ways to save money and there's finding ways to make money.

Anyway, I'm rambling on too long here, let me know in the comments section below if that

would be a type of content that you'd be interested in watching.

But that'll do it for me today once again if you enjoyed this video be sure to subscribe

and hit that Bell next to my name so that you'll be notified of all my future uploads.

I generally upload every single Monday, and if you have a friend that would be interested

in this kind of content be sure to share it with them and let's really get this information

out there and start our own Financial revolution.

For more infomation >> What To Do When The Stock Market Crashes (The Answer Is Simple, But Not Always Easy!) - Duration: 17:18.

-------------------------------------------

D.J. Byrnes and Jena Powell Answer how Campaign Contributions Influence their campaigns. - Duration: 2:44.

Moderator: Next Question - How will your campaign contributors affect your policy decisions

while in office.

D.J. Byrnes: My campaign contributors are why in running.

I only accept money from individuals and labor unions.

I am my top campaign donor, I talked to my accountant today I'm about $36,000 in the hole (in self-funding)

We've spent about $56,000 overall

...running down my list (of contributors), me, my father maxed out - god bless him.

Russ Wheeler, Heather Wheeler, my brothers and sisters at the UAW (United Autoworkers),

Kyle Jones my friend in Columbus, Ben Koo - $300, he's sitting right there.

Food and Commercial Workers (UFCW) gave $250.

I'm not bought and sold, and these politicians can stand up here and say, "Oh I take this

money and it doesn't affect my vote."

Well follow the money.

These businesses have done the research.

There is a reason they're handing out $12,000 bags.

...and it's because they're getting their money back.

So, I'm the only one up here in this that's going to speak honestly about who's funding

their campaign... as we're about to find out.

Jena Powell: When I entered this race, um, you know it was for our community and

our district as a whole.

I've had the opportunity to have hundreds of local donors, I've had organizations, um, and

businesses across the state of Ohio and in our district as a whole.

Umm, every single day I talk to different people and I say "OK how can we serve our

district better and fight for them."

And I definitely look forward to doing that.

Moderator: Did you want to address the campaign contributors?

Jena: Oh, I did.

Would you like me to address it specifically?

Moderator: It's fine

D.J. Byrnes: Since my opponent doesn't want to be clear on who's funding her, I'd just like to read off

some of her top donors.

Murray Energy - $12,000.

The Boeich Family, swamp people from Columbus - $24,000.

First Energy Corporation - $12,700.

Moderator: I think you can rebut a point of hers but I'm not sure that...

D.J. Byrnes: Yeah, no, I am.

It just speaks to...

When politicians are up here and they can't even speak honestly, about publicly available

information, that should be setting off alarm bells for you.

These energy companies are coming for a deregulation push next year.

And they're planning on her vote.

Không có nhận xét nào:

Đăng nhận xét