-------------------------------------------
Are these dots purple or blue? Your answer might not be as reliable as you think - Duration: 2:07.
Every day, humans make dozens of judgements,
from deciding whether our clothes match to
determining whether a shady character
in the street is a threat.
Such decisions aren't based on hard-and-fast rules,
a new study reveals.
Instead, our concept of "threat" -
and even of the color "blue" – is all relative.
To make the find, researchers showed non color-blind
participants a series of 1000 dots ranging
from very blue to very purple, and asked them
to judge whether each dot was blue.
For the first 200 trials,
participants saw an equal number of dots
from the blue and purple parts of the spectrum,
but then the prevalence of blue dots gradually
decreased to just a fraction of what it was before.
By the end of the study,
participants' interpretation of the colors had changed:
dots that they had thought were purple
in the first set of trials they now classified as blue
That is, their concept of the color blue
had expanded to also include shades of purple.
Even when the researchers forewarned participants
that blue dots would become rarer and promised
them money if they kept their judgments consistent,
the same shift occurred.
And the team found similar results in
more complex versions of the task, where participants
had to judge whether a face was threatening
or if a research proposal was ethical.
When threatening faces became less common,
people started to consider previously benign
examples as posing a threat.
These results could explain why so many people
tend to be pessimistic about the state of the world.
As common problems become rare, previously
minor issues start to seem much more problematic.
-------------------------------------------
Darth Maul: Straight Answer - Duration: 0:03.
I'm here for my brother
Am I your brother?
Yes
-------------------------------------------
Robert Pattinson and Mia Wasikowska answer the web's most searched question SUB ITA - Duration: 4:07.
For more infomation >> Robert Pattinson and Mia Wasikowska answer the web's most searched question SUB ITA - Duration: 4:07. -------------------------------------------
Labour First Minister Won't Answer - Duration: 1:46.
For more infomation >> Labour First Minister Won't Answer - Duration: 1:46. -------------------------------------------
【影片】Answer Ball！羅斯投進一球對著火箭替補席說垃圾話，哈登立馬在他頭上打進一顆3+1完美復仇！ - Duration: 0:53.
4月16日，NBA季後賽繼續進行，火箭大戰灰狼隊。 上半場比賽火箭隊領先了7分，然而進入到第三節後形勢急轉直下 灰狼在第三節開局前3分鐘打的火箭一分沒得，然後迅速將比分反超 4分
此時火箭隊大哥哈登挺身而出，試圖追分的哈登在羅斯的外線防 下，突然拔地而起投出三分球造三分犯規，然而裁判只給了普通犯規 而且還沒到罰球次數。哈登對此非常不滿追著裁判理論，結果裁判嚴 按照「哈登規則」執法，就是不給哈登投籃犯規，全場2萬名火箭死 狂噓裁判
結果不到60秒，先是在防守端，羅斯投進一顆球之後 還朝著火箭的替補席說了幾句垃圾話，但是作為球隊老大的哈登就用 為華麗的表現做出了回應，他面對羅斯的防守，直接打成了3+1， 僅3分球進，還造成了羅斯的犯規，輕鬆打4分成功
在哈登罰球之際，全場2萬名火箭死忠，再一次響起了山呼海嘯般的 MVP」，顯然，哈登今天確實打出了MVP最該擁有的水準。完美 復仇！
Không có nhận xét nào:
Đăng nhận xét