Thứ Tư, 28 tháng 2, 2018

Auto news on Youtube Feb 28 2018

You often come thinking that you can teach people a whole bunch of things but

really it's the relationships here that teach you about yourself, about the

person that you want to be. My name is Victoria Woods, I'm a graduate of

Loyalist College's Developmental Services Worker program. I graduated in 2014, and

I am a house assistant at L'Arche Saint John. I grew up with an older brother that has a

disability who is very, very close to me, so working with people with disabilities

is something I've always liked doing. In L'Arche, it's a little different than your typical workday; it's more of a lifestyle.

I don't have a commute in the morning.

I live in the house, so I get out of bed and help people with breakfast,

get them off to work, support people in activities that they want to do like

bowling, swimming. That's really fun being able to support my friends to go out

into the world. I didn't think my studies at Loyalist would bring me to the East

Coast, but I'm sure glad they did. The skills that you learn in the DSW

program are easily transferable. I know of grads who have gone to other

provinces, even other countries with what they've learned and that's really great.

So the philosophies of L'Arche and Loyalist are quite similar in the way

of that people with disabilities have so much to offer the world, they have gifts

and talents to celebrate. That's something I personally believe in and

L'Arche believes and Loyalist's DSW program really underlines.

For more infomation >> Loyalist College – Developmental Services Worker - Duration: 1:56.

-------------------------------------------

Pueblo Animal Services will have a new set of rules to follow - Duration: 2:17.

For more infomation >> Pueblo Animal Services will have a new set of rules to follow - Duration: 2:17.

-------------------------------------------

Behind the Bricks Does: Parking Services - Duration: 7:10.

[Behind the Bricks Intro song]

Hi my name is Shayna Ginster. I'm here with Behind the Bricks today we're

touring parking services to see what they do. Let's take a ride! [upbeat music]

We are here in

the Welcome Center. We are here with. -[DW] Diamond Wilson [SG] Can you explain a little

bit to me about your role here in the Welcome Center? [DW] Well first of all I

provide information so everyone that comes on campus stops here and they'll

tell me why they're here and where they're going and I'll direct them there.

You always have to pretty much be happy you know because people come in and some

a lot of times they're frustrated and it's just nice to get a refreshing smile

and and a good person to talk to it's refreshing to know that you can actually

impact somebody from such a small position

[upbeat music]

[SG] We're in the car here with

[CB] Cedric Bowen [SG] We're gonna take a ride see what parking

does and maybe give out some tickets.

[SG] Cedric so what do you do on a daily basis? [CB] I go around making sure people are

doing what they supposed to do not only just tickets but I'm also helping people

[JC] my name is John Connelly I am the parking enforcement operations manager

for the parking and transportation department at the University. I've been here

almost 15 years majority of it was with Public Safety and almost two years here

at the parking and transportation. Our goal here is to make sure people are

doing the right things and to provide that pleasant parking experience for

everyone else who's trying to do the right thing. [SG] so how is technology changed

your job since you started working here over the years? [CB] Well we have license plate

readers now I'm not even looking at this vehicle if I go by it, it read the plate

there could be somebody who's not supposed to be on campus. These LPRs

would catch them if they ride by where I might not catch them. A lot of people

think that it's like something fun to do. A ticket is never fun is not

funny [JC] Even writing citations we don't like to

write citations I hate the write citations my guys hate to write it cuz

it means you're having a bad day you're gonna get a citation you're not gonna

feel happy about it but hopefully it's to the right person it's gonna be a

heads up hey I shouldn't park here and learn my lesson let's move on from here.

[SG] For some of my friends they can't find spots and I've heard people are making

up their own spots and stuff like that out how is that been going for you

this year? [CB] There's people

parking on campus that shouldn't be and we'd put a ticket on the car to

hopefully deter them from you know getting more tickets but sometimes the

attitude is I don't care or I got to go to class you know so I can't find the

spot I'm gonna do it or I'm running late. I know I wear both hats I'm student here

I know what it's like to ride around and look for parking spaces. Do the right

thing that's that's the main thing do the right thing. [JC] every semester every

day's different last fall was we saw an uptick in the demand to the parking. We

made a lot of changes and to incorporate other options, viable

options. For instance B-Lot, the first-year residents lot we sent an

email to those permit holders and we got them over to K-Lot and we freed up about

3 to 4 hundred spaces over in B lot to have the option to park in B lot and take a

shuttle bus from the lot over to the center of campus. [SG] are you good with

singing cuz I like to sing like I'm not good at singing [CB] what songs do you like

[SG] well maybe I could sing and you can dance? Does that work for you? [Ready for It? - Taylor Swift plays] in the middle of

the night of my dreams

*indistinguishable*

ba-by

[SG] so how many tickets would you say you give out per day? Per week? [CB] it can be

anywhere between 50 and 100 [SG] Per day? [CB] Per day. So first ticket that's a warning

then after that the tickets are live. Most tickets are $30 so if the behavior

continues a person can go to Student Conduct. [SG] If a student gets a ticket and

they want up appeal that ticket well do you have any advice to give them? [CB] when

you come you know most tickets we take photos and stuff of so be truthful. [JC] to

appeal better have some meat and potatoes on it if you say yep I'm gonna appeal

because I just ran inside for five minutes and parked in a fire lane that's

not a proper appeal if you had some meat and potatoes, there's some backbone to

it file an appeal anything other than just frivolous jargon you don't want to

get a ticket it might not be appealed [SG] okay what about this song? you know this

song? [Havana - Camilla Cabello plays] Oh it's the big thing right now

[CB] That two-step

[CB] Then you got. [SG] oh okay I'm learning from the best right now.

[JC] We met

as a group, met as facilities overall met with senior leadership, student governing

bodies and we got a plan in place to incorporate a faculty-staff

accountability program where come August 2018 the balance of citations you may

have received needs to be at zero before you can park or purchase a parking

permit at the University. So hopefully that accountability is gonna help moving

forward to create more spacing for the University and everybody alike. [SG] So on

your laptop you can see everybody's different kinds of permits

and stuff? [CB] I don't see people you know that's that's another thing like you

know people thin...oh...like we're looking for a person like it's personal.

Nope. We just see the vehicle doing wrong now we have to find the person. Oooh, it's not looking good. [SG] you want

to show us how writing a ticket works? [CB] I have to make sure that that information

lines up with the license plate and it does. It's a warning right they don't

have any previous history so there you go you get to see a warning. [SG] there you go [CB] so

hopefully when they see this warning they do the right thing they're gonna be

more careful right save and print and there's a ticket.

[upbeat music]

[SG] As long as kids follow the rules that's all you got to do? [CB] If they follow the rules

I'd be so happy. [SG] well thank you so much for talking with us today [CB] no problem my

pleasure [SG] all right so this was Behind the Bricks with parking services

my name is Shayna Ginster, I had a blast. [Behind the Bricks outro music]

For more infomation >> Behind the Bricks Does: Parking Services - Duration: 7:10.

-------------------------------------------

GWS Professional Services - GYST - where's your ideal property and credit ratings - Duration: 2:28.

My name is Jasmine. I'm Jessica and we are the founding business advisors for GWS

Professional Services. Part of our mission is to help you get the G.Y.S.T of things

that's just with a "Y" not an "I" - our anagram for "Get Your Stuff Together".

In anticipation of our meeting with a financial advisor on Monday

we would like to talk to you today about the ideal property and your credit rating, because we've been doing one today haven't we?

Yeah, we've been doing a couple of credit ratings. We don't really know where they get these numbers from so we've been sort of

learning about it a little bit and we're hoping that a meeting on Monday might

shed some light onto how that number can affect us getting our idea property. Hopefully our credit ratings will be good soon enough in order to get a home in the near future. Well, we were good. We weren't below average

We weren't BAD. Well we were above average. Above the lowest 50%. That's good! What would your ideal property be?

Um, I would like to live somewhere quiet actually. I'm not really keen on a city lifestyle. Somewhere with a backyard I guess, where I can have my pets. What about you? Yeah I love the beach so, I don't really fancy the Sydney beaches that much. Maroubra is nice but my partner hates it so I'm never going to live there. South Coast? Central Coast? Not as expensive as the city. And it's got everything you need anyway

so it's just a matter of us getting our stuff together and saving up for our property I guess

Seeing if we can get a home loan really. When are you going to be getting a loan?

Well ideally within the next 5 years but I don't know if that's going to happen. Maybe our financial advisor it can help us tomorrow with that.

Well hopefully, we'll see. Anyway that's all for us for today leave some comments below about should you a

great rating if you want to know the best one

to go to that we think from assholes from doing all the three or four

different tests like the government suggests on their website send us a

message comment below ruler tell you where to go

For more infomation >> GWS Professional Services - GYST - where's your ideal property and credit ratings - Duration: 2:28.

-------------------------------------------

We need a big stick in the wing to encourage financial services to comply with Australia's laws - Duration: 15:06.

Ms BUTLER (Griffith) (10:31 ): It is really a pleasure to be here to speak in respect

of the Treasury Laws Amendment (2017 Measures No. 5) Bill 2017 and the ASIC Supervisory

Cost Recovery Levy Amendment Bill 2017.

I do note the member for Burt's criticisms of the naming of the bills, and I agree with

him that it is important to be transparent about exactly what we're debating.

Having made those remarks, I would like to talk about the contents of the bills and to

specifically go to just a few issues in respect of each of the substantive parts of the legislation.

Mr Deputy Speaker, as you well know, the Australian Securities and Investments Commission plays

an incredibly important role in the context of our economy, as Australia's markets corporate

and financial services regulator.

I have to say that there is a lot of scepticism out there about whether or not it's even possible

in our system, given the power that banks have, for a regulator to do anything to affect

their conduct or to hold them to account.

We certainly would say on our side that it is important that there be a banking royal

commission and that it be a genuine banking royal commission that will look at holding

these industry participants to account.

I note that the government has instituted its own royal commission, after being dragged

kicking and screaming to doing so.

It took a long time for the government to acknowledge even the possibility of having

a royal commission.

Labor has made some criticisms of the conditions under which the royal commission has been

established, and I won't repeat them here.

But suffice it to say, our nation is in need of some good, strong scrutiny into the practices

of Australia's banks.

It is taking a royal commission to do that.

At the same time, there needs to be an ongoing strong regulator that can be Australia's financial

services regulator, that can hold the banks to account and, most importantly, that can

enforce Australia's laws.

So you would be aware, Mr Deputy Speaker Mitchell, because of the interest that you take in financial

services matters, that there has been some recent litigation brought by the Australian

Securities and Investments Commission in respect of manipulation of the bank bill swap rate

against Australia's four big banks.

Two of those proceedings have settled, with each of the two settling banks paying tens

of millions of dollars in fines as a consequence of their conduct in respect of the bank bill

swap rate.

One did not settle, but it has concluded in terms of hearings and a decision is awaited.

The fourth, in relation to the Commonwealth, has really only just kicked off.

We've only just this week seen the detailed allegations being made against the Commonwealth

Bank in that case.

I'm sure we will all be following it with great interest.

It is important to reflect on what we expect of a regulator like ASIC when it comes to

litigation.

This is a point that I raised with the new chair, James Shipton, and I might use this

opportunity to welcome him to the chairmanship of the Australian Securities and Investments

Commission.

He is filling big shoes.

I do hope he will take a very, very robust approach to enforcement of the law and to

consumer protection and making sure that ASIC's responsibilities in respect of consumer protection

are discharged.

I put to him quite recently in a committee hearing that there are some thorny issues

for ASIC in terms of how they go when they prosecute companies, particularly banks, or

bring civil proceedings against them.

That is this: if they win all their cases, does that show they are successful and invincible

as a regulator?

The concept of apparent regulatory invincibility is an important one.

Market participants need to feel that if there are proceedings pursued against them they

are likely to cause real difficulty in the event that the participant has engaged in

unlawful conduct.

Or does a high success rate mean that the regulator is pursuing only the easy cases

and not the hard cases?

In other words, a high success rate can be interpreted in very different ways when it

comes to litigation.

In this case, I think we can be confident that these cases that ASIC is bringing in

respect of the manipulation of the bank bill swap rate would not be considered to be easy

cases.

We will wait and see what outcomes arise once the courts hand down their decisions, particularly

in respect of the matter that has concluded its hearings but hasn't yet been finalised

and in respect of the new Commonwealth Bank matter, the other two having settled.

But we should be wary and cautious, whatever the outcome, that we do not inadvertently,

by our responses, put pressure on the regulator to stop bringing hard cases and to stop taking

on issues that are complex and involve breaches of different aspects of the law.

Having said that, the existing provisions that ASIC is using to pursue these particular

cases in respect of financial benchmarks manipulation are important but clearly insufficient in

terms of future work in this area.

So it's quite pleasing that this bill is bringing forward additional regulation and the establishment

of criminal offences in respect of financial benchmarks manipulation.

The bill will make manipulation of all financial benchmarks used in Australia a specific criminal

offence as well as being subject to civil penalties.

Individuals will be liable to fines of up to the greater of three times the benefit

they gain or $945,000, which is 4,500 penalty units.

Of course penalty units continue to grow as they are adjusted.

A body corporate, on the other hand, will be liable to fines of up to the greater of

$9.45 million—which is 45,000 penalty units—three times any benefits from the manipulation,

or 10 per cent of the entity's turnover in the previous year.

These are meaningful penalties.

That's what we need in this country.

We do need there to be a big stick in the wings so that there are incentives for industry

participants to conduct themselves according to the law.

Often the existence of these provisions is enough to deter unlawful conduct.

I'm certainly not saying that ASIC should be doing nothing but bringing legal proceedings.

Of course they need to have a multidimensional and multifaceted approach to encouraging willing

compliance, seeking undertakings, seeking civil remedies where appropriate and ultimately

being able to seek criminal penalties as well.

That's a hierarchy of different approaches to the regulation of industry, and it's a

judgement call as to which part of that hierarchy should be used at any one time.

I certainly don't mean to suggest that there should be nothing but criminal prosecutions.

Having said that, the availability of criminal prosecutions is crucial to ensure that there

are incentives in both senses—both positive and adverse incentives—for the industry

participants to comply with the law.

The manipulation of financial benchmarks has real life consequences for people—for people

sitting around the household table, for people in their businesses trying to work out what

to invest.

If there's manipulation of benchmarks then that can put up the cost of borrowing and

that can damage the confidence that our society has in our financial markets and in financial

services provision.

Of course, anything that damages confidence makes investment more difficult, makes loan

decisions more difficult and makes economic activity more difficult.

So it is important that, in seeking to maintain confidence and regulation of our financial

services sector, these criminal offences are introduced and there are strong laws incentivising

good behaviour in the financial services sector.

Secondly, this bill will establish a new licensing regime requiring administrators of certain

designated significant financial benchmarks to obtain a new benchmark administrator licence

from ASIC.

Again this regulation will assist in promoting confidence in the financial services sector,

so I welcome it.

These bills also go to the supervisory cost recovery levy.

Deputy Speaker, you'll recall that the new supervisory cost recovery levy was introduced

last year and started taking effect from 1 July 2017.

The government introduced a user-pays model, where those being regulated make a contribution

to the cost of regulating them.

The formulae that have been set up are aimed at allocating the costs to those who require

the most regulation, so it's a complex set of formulae.

When we spoke about this move to having the industry pay for the operations of ASIC we

noted that that might give some opportunities in respect of some of ASIC's other work.

I specifically want to mention the shadow minister's speech of 15 June 2017.

She did note the complexity in the way that the industry cost model has been created and

indicated that we would be watching that closely, which remains the case.

We also accept that it's important that ASIC be properly resourced so that it can be a

good, strong law enforcement focused regulator.

Of course, the government's own conduct hasn't always been consistent in sending that message

to ASIC.

You'll recall the $120 million cut to ASIC in the 2014 budget.

I spoke against that particular component of the 2014 budget at the time.

I thought it was reckless to take away funding from one of our important white-collar crime

regulators.

Anyone who's read the 2014 statement of expectations of the government towards ASIC would find

it fairly light on when it comes to consumer protection.

There's a lot of quite warm language in there about encouraging compliance, but you don't

see from this government a really full-voiced robust demand that the regulator really focus

on consumer protection.

I hope that will be taken into account when the government drafts the next statement of

expectations for ASIC, in the event that there is another one coming down the pipeline now

that there is a new chair.

The shadow minister also in her speech on the original ASIC industry cost-recovery legislation

noted that, as part of the government's process of developing that bill , there had been submissions

calling for additional funding for financial counselling services, including from Financial

Counselling Australia and the consumer group CHOICE.

The shadow minister said: Given the importance of financial counsellors

to those in financial trouble, and their importance to the functioning of the financial sector,

we think that these issues warrant further consideration from the Government.

I do hope that the government has taken that on board.

My interest in financial counselling, apart from the general interest that anyone in this

place would have, arises from my role as the shadow assistant minister for preventing family

violence.

That is because there is an important need for financial counselling for women leaving

violent relationships.

It's a time of great risk of poverty and, accordingly, it is important to note that

the shadow minister, in addressing the previous bill, talked about the arguments that had

been made in the context of the industry funding model that there should be consideration given

as to how that might support further or better resourcing for financial counselling in this

country.

I make no further comment on that other than to draw the attention of the House to those

remarks that the shadow minister made at the time.

The other part of this bill that can't really go without comment is the Productivity Commission

reform.

This reform will, or is at least intended to, set up a regime with a view to ensuring

that Indigenous perspectives are included in the Productivity Commission's consideration

of policy measures.

There has been, I think, a lot of concern raised about the definition of Indigeneity

contained in this legislation.

I hope that the government will take on board the criticisms that have been made.

We do not need to go backwards in the way that we recognise Indigeneity in this nation.

We don't need, in something that's purportedly designed to improve outcomes for Indigenous

people, to inflict upon them old-fashioned and outdated thinking in respect of definitions

of Indigeneity, and I certainly hope that this is a matter that will be able to resolved

by consent, once this legislation heads to the Senate.

I'm sure that the member for Lingiari, who will be speaking in respect of this legislation

soon, will have many more things to say about the definition of Indigeneity in the legislation.

It is important to say in the context of this that I acknowledge that the Turnbull government

is seeking to create in the Productivity Commission a specific focus on the impact of policies

that are created purportedly for the benefit of Indigenous people.

But it's another thing altogether to actually listen to Indigenous people themselves through

a mechanism that provides them with a real voice to parliament as was anticipated by

the Uluru Statement from the Heart.

I call on the Prime Minister to rethink his opposition to supporting the Uluru Statement

from the Heart.

I hope that he will listen to Indigenous people and make good on his commitment to do things

with people, not to them.

For more infomation >> We need a big stick in the wing to encourage financial services to comply with Australia's laws - Duration: 15:06.

-------------------------------------------

Access your favorite streaming services, wherever you are - get Phantom VPN - Duration: 0:21.

Meet John.

He's trying to watch the big game online.

Unfortunately, it's unavailable for streaming outside the US.

It's a good thing that John traveled prepared for this.

Avira Phantom VPN.

Access your favorite streaming services, wherever you are.

Download Avira Phantom VPN now for free from the App Store

or Google Play Store.

For more infomation >> Access your favorite streaming services, wherever you are - get Phantom VPN - Duration: 0:21.

-------------------------------------------

House Health and Human Services Reform Committee 2/27/18 - Duration: 1:46:19.

TEST

>>: FROM FEBRUARY 22ND TO 18

ANY CORRECTIONS THAT NEED TO BE

MADE? SEEING NONE.

>>: THE BILL THAT

YOU HAVE BEFORE YOU IS THE BILL THAT

HELPS STREAMLINES RECESS

RESIDENTIAL TRUE AND CORRECT

TRUE AND TRUE AND -- UNDER

OCCUR RENT LAW BEFORE THEY CAN

START THE DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN

SERVICES; THAT PROVIDEOER MUST

ALREADY HAVE A CONTRACT IN

PLACE.

THIS BILL; ELIMINATES --

COUNTIES MACON -- THE

STATEMENT OF NEED MUST SPECIFY

THE NEED OF PROGRAM. THIS BILL

WILL HELP SPEED UP THE PROCESS

OF DEVELOPING NEW CA CAPACITY.

HOSPITALS NEED MORE VEIL

AVAILABLE TEE. THERE ARE NO

CONCERNS FROM THE DEPARTMENT OF

SERVICES.

HEALTH PARTNERS BUILT A NEW --

THANK YOU FOR YOUR SUPPORT OF

THIS BILL. IF YOU WOULD LIKE

TO COME UP AND SHARE YOUR

TESTIMONY.

>>: THANK YOU. THERE IS NO

AMENDMENT.

>>: MR. CHAIRMAN; I'M THE

DIRECT OR OF CO

MMUNITY SERVICES WE'RE OPENING OUR THIRD -- -- IT WAS EX THAT WE WERE ACTUALLY AWARDED TO THE COUNTY. WE RELY

ON OUR PARTNERS AND OUR HOW

FAST COUNTY. IT PROBABLY ADDED ABOUT 18 MONTHS TO THE PROCESS WHERE WE WERABLE TO BE BEGIN DEVELOPMENT TO THE SITE AND THE

FAY

. >>: WHA

T IS IT THAT GOES ON DERING THOSE 18 MONTHS? >>: WE BE BEGAN MEETING; WE

WONTED TO PROVIDE THAT

STATEMENT OF NEED AND OUR NEED

NOT ONLY AS HOSPITAL. WE HAVE

THE R F P PROCESS. AND ONGOING

WE'RE GOING TO HAVE THEM 3 TO 5

YEARS TO HAVE THIS CONTRACT. A

N APPROVAL BUY IO OVERRULED BY

THE COUNTY.

>>: I'M IN -- WHAT THE CHANGE

REALLY DOES. IT SOUNDS LIKE

THERE IS SOME OFFER OVERLAY.

>>: THANK YOU. ARE THERE ANY

OTHER QUESTIONS FOR THE --

THANK YOU.

>>: I JUST WANT TO SAY THIS IS

ABOUT HELPING MOVE TOWARD THAT

GOAL. >>: QUESTIONS FOR PETER

SON >>: I HOPE THAT YOU UNDER STAND THE MISSING PIECES OF

INFORMATION.

ARE WE LOSING ANYTHING BY

MAKING THIS CHANGE?

>>: THANK YOU FOR THE

QUESTION. I BELIEVES THIS IS

KEEPING THE COUNTY INFORMED.

ADDRESSING THOSE CONCERNS AND

GETTING THOSE SERVICES TO

THE COMMUNITY

>>: ANY OTHER QUESTIONS?

>>: THANK YOU; MR.

CHAIRMAN. WE ARE IN FULL SUPPORT OF THIS

LEGISLATION. WE HAVE A LOT TO

DO YET AND WE WANT TO DEVELOP

THESE FAY FACILITIES.

>>: THANK YOU. ALL THOSE IN

FAVOR.

>>: THE MOTION IS TO HOUSE

FLOOR -- WITH THAT I'LL IN --

ITS SIMPLY MOVING THINGS

AROUND.

>>: ALL RIGHT. PLEASE STATE

YOUR TESTIMONY.

>>: HI. I'VE HAD TO FILE

CHILD ABUSE -- THE SYSTEM IS

BROKEN. HERE IS THE SECTION;

IT SAYS IN CASES IN RESULTING

IN DEATH; TO MAKE IS DEENTER

-- IN PERFORMING ANY OF THESE

DUTIES; THAT'S WHAT THEY CALL

THE FINAL BLOW LAW. THIS

PROCESS FOR C P S TO REMOEFB A

CHILD. IT'S NOT ENOUGH. THIS

BILL HAS THE SAME LANGUAGE FROM

THE PRIO OR BILL. IN 500

PAGES OF LEGISLATION IS NOT

EFFECTIVE. THIS IS NOT A GOOD

WAY TO PROTECT KIDS. I'VE

SEEN A LIST; CHILD PROTECH SHUN

NEEDS TO TAKE PRIO OR TEE.

>>: COULD YOU BRIEFLY SAY THE

ONE THING IN YOUR EXPERIENCE?

>>: WHEN YOU HAVE A STACK OF

POLICE REPORTS LIKE THIS; THERE

IS NO PROCESS. LESS THAN 200

CASES FOR MENTAL HEALTH ABUSE.

THEY SAID IT'S PHYSICAL OR

NOT. I COULDN'T GET THAT THROUGH.

THEY SEE -- YOU SHOULD BE

CAREFUL ABOUT WHAT YOU'RE

SAYING. THEY'RE SAYING THIS

COULD BE A FALSE

ALLIGATION. IF YOU HAVE PAGES OF BRUISES

HAPPENING AND YOU'RE ASKING THE

SIMPLE QUESTION SO THAT YOU

DON'T GET IN TROUBLE; YOU HAVE

TO BE CAREFUL ABOUT YOUR

WORDING. THIS ISN'T A CLEAR

CUT SITUATION. ITS THE

EDGE CASE AND YOU HAVE TO DEAL WITH

IT AND THERE IS NOBODY THERE

SPEAKING ON BE HALF OF THE KID.

THEY'RE NOT READY TO ACT.

ONE CHILD WAS REMOVED. HE WAS

RESTORED TO THE FAMILY IN ABOUT

A MONTH. I ASKED THE SIBLING.

HE SAID NO ONE BELIEVES ME. I

SAID YOU'RE NINE; RECORD IT.

THE C P S SAID WE'RE GOING TO

FOSTER CARE. THESE PEOPLE ARE

SICK OF DEALING WITH THESE

CASES. THEY CALLED THIS A HIGH

RISK SITUATION AND NO FOLLOW

UP. THIS PROCESS; IT'S NOT

EFFECTIVE. I DON'T KNOW WHAT

ELSE TO SAY EXCEPT THAT

IT NEEDS TO BE CHANGED. IT'S NOT

THAT I ONLY HAVE A SITUATION.

IT'S THE STATE. IT'S NOT A

-- NO ONE WILL MAKE IT A PRIO

TEE. I WOULD SAY LET'S REACH

OUT TO PEOPLE WHO HAVE FILED

BEFORE. HOW MANY OF THEM WERE

AFRAID TO SAY WHAT WAS REALLY

GOING ON?

>>: ALL RIGHT.

>>: THANK YOU MR. CHAIR. I'M

CURIOUS; --

>>: THERE'S ANOTHER FATHER

INVOLVED AND HE SAID THIS IS A

BIG DEAL. HIM AND HIS WIFE

WERE READY TO GIVE UP. THERE

IS NO WAY TO GET IN FRONT OF

THIS. I'VE SEEN -- THERE IS

STILL PENDING ACT -- YOU

EXHAUST EVERYTHING. YOU APPEAR

LIKE YOUR MOTIVES ARE SUSPECT.

THEY GET 30 PEOPLE IN A ROOM

AND NOTHING HAPPENS BECAUSE

IT'S NOT ENOUGH.

>>: THANK YOU. FRANKLY; I'VE

HAD CONVERSATIONS. THEY KNOW

THAT THE PEOPLE WHO THEY TALK

TO MAKE A DOE --

>>: ANY QUESTIONS FROM

MEMBERS? FINAL WORD.

>>: I -- THIS LAW IS A

REWRITE OF THE STATUTE. WE

CHANGED THE LAW SO MANY TIMES

THAT WE MADE IT MESSY SO THAT

IT'S EASIER TO READ. WHEN

WE'RE WORKING THROUGH THESE

ISSUES. YOU GAVE ME AN

OPPORTUNITY FOR MY SOAPBOX.

THIS IS THE HEART THAT WE END

UP DEALING WITH. AT THIS STAGE

WE HAVE KIDS THAT ARE TREATED

TO POORLY AND THE TRAUMA THAT

THEY EXPERIENCE CAN'T BE SHAKEN

OFF. THEY LOOK TO THINGS TO

TRY TO FIX THOSE. BY THE TIME

THAT CHILD IS REPORTED THE

DAMAGE IS DO NOT. WE SPEND A

LIFETIME TRYING TO UN-- IT. I

GOT TO TELL YOU WE'RE REPORTING

OVER 70 ;000 KIDS. WAIT UNTIL

THEY BECOME ADULTS. WE HAVE A

TRAINING BILL COMING UP FOR

SOCIAL WORKERS. I'M CERTAINLY

NOT A BUREAUCRATIC FENDER

HERE.

>>: THANK YOU FOR THE WORK

THAT YOU HAVE DO NOT ON THIS.

I AGREE WITH YOU THAT THIS IS

ONE OF THE BIGGEST ISSUE THAT

WE FACE. HOW ARE WE GIVING

THEM OPPORTUNITY TO BE

SUCCESSFUL. WE KNOW THAT OUR

STATE IS ONLY GOING TO BE

SUCCESSFUL IF EVERYBODY IS

INCLUDED. WHAT YOU HAVE

THOUGHT ABOUT IN TERMS OF

PREVENTION.

SO HAVE YOU THOUGHT ABOUT

ANYTHING THAT HELPS PAR RENTS

BE BETTER. THE PREVENTION

SIDE. THIS HAPPENS WHEN A

FAMILY WALKS BY AND DOESN'T SAY

HOW DO I HELP YOU? I'LL GIVE

YOU AN EXAMPLE OF TRY TO BE A

FOSTER PAR RENT. WE KEEP

PUTTING THINGS IN PLACE BECAUSE

WE FEEL GOOD ABOUT IT. WE CAN

MAKE A LIST; WE CAN CREATE POST

IT NOTES. BUT WE HAVE TO FIND

A WAY SO THAT WHEN A FAMILY IS

STRUGGLING; OTHER FAMILY STEPS

IN TO HELP. A LOT OF TIMES

THAT'S THE PROBLEM; NOBODY IS

THERE TO HELP THEM OUT.

GOVERNMENT CAN'T DO THAT. I

SAY WE COLLECTIVELY ARE MISSING

THE BOAT. HOW MANY OF US CAN

BECOME FOSTER PAR RENTS FOR 24

HOURS. THIS HAS TO COME FROM

US DOING BETTER.

>>: THE MOTION PREVAILS.

HOUSE FILE 2074.

REPRESENTATIVE DEAN.

ONE AMENDMENT AND YOU WANT TO

MOEFB MOVE THE A ONE

AMENDMENT.

>>: TAKE A LEAD ON THIS; IT

ALLOWS FAMILY MEMBERS WITH RARE

DID DID DISEASES -- THIS

REALLY PROVIDES SOME MAPS TO BE

ABLE TO BAND TOGETHER. THE

AMENDMENT A ONE ADDS A SECTION;

THE D E GETS THE BILL INTO

SHAPE NARROWS DOWN.

>>: AMENDMENT AS AMENDED.

SEEING NONE. ALL IN FAVOR AS

AMENDED. THE AMENDMENT AS

AMENDED IS ADOPTED. TO YOUR

BILL.

>>: ONE OF THE THINGS THAT IS

IMPORTANT -- EVEN RESEARCH

AT THE UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA AND

MAY O CLINIC IS LOOKING AT

THERAPIES RITE EIGHTH RIGHT

NOW. HOW THAT CAN AVENUE --

AFFECT. NOW YOU WILL FIND WHEN

YOU TALK TO PAR RENTS OF

CHILDREN WITH RARE DISEASES

THEY HAVE TO DO RESEARCH ON

THEIR OWN; BECOME

FUND-RAISERS. DOWN THE ROAD WHAT WOULD BE

BETTER IS TO ALLOW WAYS FOR

PARENTS TO DIRECTLY CONNECT

WITH THERAPIES

AND CLINICAL TRIALS THAT'S WHAT THIS IS ATTEMPTING TO DO. AND HELP

FAMILIES HERE IN MINNESOTA AND

ACROSS THE COUNTRY.

>>: I'M HERE IN SUPPORT OF THE

BILL. MY CHILD IS ONE OF THE

MIRACLES. THANK YOU UNIVERSITY

OF MINNESOTA. SHE LOOKS HAPPY

AND HEALTHY. THAT SMILE IS

STILL THERE. SHE CAN NO LONGER

SPEAK AT ALL. SHE

COMMUNICATES WITH EYE -- M L D

FOR SHORT. SINCE MY --

I CONTACTED A DOCTOR IN

CONNECTICUT. MORE TESTS WERE

ORDERED BUT NO ANSWERS WERE

FOUND. AS I SAT IN HER ROOM

TELLING ALL INVOLVED THAT WE

WEREN'T LEAVING WITHOUT ANSWERS

A YOUNG DOCTOR -- SHE SEEN IT

ONCE AT THE UNIVERSITY OF

MINNESOTA. I TRIED TO FIG YOU

-- THE FIGHT FOR HER LIFE BEING

CARED FOR BY AN UNBELIEVABLE

TEAM. I WOULD FIGHT FOR HER

MEDICATION. I WOULD FIGHT FOR

THEM IN -- I'D FIGHT FOR HOME

NURSING CARE; HOSPITAL CARE EX

TENSIONS. EVENING DOCTOR

APPOINTMENTS. TO KEEP MY

HOUSE. THIS IS THE REALITY

OF RARE DID DID SEASES.

PLEASE HELP ME JUST BE HER

MOM. PICK UP THE BATTLE FOR ME AND

FAMILIES LIKE MINE.

>>: THANK YOU FOR TAKING THE

TIME TO SHARE YOUR STORY WITH

US.

>>: DO YOU HAVE ANY OTHER

THIS MORNING?

>>: WELCOME. PRESENT YOUR

TESTIMONY.

>>: I'M A PARENT AD --

ADVOCATE. THIS WAS MY

DAUGHTERS CASE. SHE HAS A RARE

DISEASE. THE ONLY

AVAILABLE TRUE AND CORRECT STATEMENT --

TREATMENT WAS HERE IN

UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA. IN

THE MEANTIME HE DEVELOPED A

TREATMENT THAT THE BONE MARE

ROW TRANSPLANT GIVES MORE TIME

TO PATIENTS. THAT DIDN'T

HAPPEN FOR HER; SHE PASSED AWAY

45 DAYS AGO.

ALL THIS IS ADDED TO THE DAILY

STRUGGLE THAT FAMILIES HAVE TO

DEAL WITH EVERY DAY.

I BELIEVE THAT THE

UNDER STANDING OF THE UNIQUE

CHALLENGES; FROM BENCH TO

BEDSIDE. I THINK IT WILL HELP

THE STATE MAXIMIZE RESOURCES.

STREAMLINING PROCESSES. WHERE

A LOT OF THE FUNDS GET LOST.

WE WENT THROUGH ALL OF THE

HOOPS OF PROCESSES. IN MY

EXPERIENCE THE STATE OF

MINNESOTA HAS BEEN CARING; A

RARE DISEASE COUNCIL WOULD BE

OUTSTANDING. BECAUSE OF THE

WORK OF THE DOCTOR MY DAUGHTER

HAD -- THANK YOU.

>>: THANK YOU FOR

BRINGING YOUR TESTIMONY TO US THIS

MORNING AND WE'RE SORRY FOR

YOUR LOSS. ANY QUESTIONS? IS

THERE ANYONE ELSE WHO WANTS TO

TESTIFY? ARE THERE ANY

QUESTIONS FOR THE BILL AUTHOR?

SEEING NONE.

>>: IT WAS RARE

DISEASE DAY AT THE UNIVERSITY OF

MINNESOTA. ONE OF THE REASON --

RESEARCHERS HIGHLIGHTED THIS

DISEASE. HOPEFULLY THIS

WILL BE A WAY THAT WE CAN HELP

PARENTS AND THE RESEARCH.

>>: WITH THAT REPRESENTATIVE

DEAN RENEWS HIS MOTION. SAY

AYE. MOTION PREVAILS. AT THE

REPRESENTATIVE DEAN.

SHIFTING GEARS A BIT.

REPRESENTATIVE DEAN WE HAVE THE

BILL BEFORE US. TO YOUR BILL.

>>: 2725 LOOKS AT HE

ELIGIBILITY SYSTEMS -- THIS IS

A CONTINUATION.

HOW IT WORKS FROM THE COUNTIES

SIDE AS THEY'RE GOING THROUGH

THAT PROCESS.

THE A BILL TEE FOR COUNTIES TO

RESPOND TO THAT. BOTH

COUNTIES HAVE TO DO THE SAME THING IN

DEALS WITH OUR STATE FUNDED

PROGRAMS. TRYING TO MAKE

SURE THAT FAMILIAR -- FAMILIES ARE

GETTING WHAT THEY NEED THREW

THROUGH OUR PUBLIC PROGRAMS. I

STARTED LOOKING TO TRY TO

FIGURE THIS PROBLEM OUT. I

WOULD MEET WITH COUNTY

CASEWORKERS TO GET FEEDBACK AT

THE END OF THE DAY TO SEE WHAT

WAS WORKING. THEN WE WOULD DO

A TOWN HALL AT NIGHT. IT WAS

AT ONE OF THOSE LATE MEETINGS

THAT THIS KIND OF CAME FROM.

WE HAD THE INSURANCE

BROKERS AND IT WAS A DISCUSSION --

THEY WERE TRYING TO DO EACH

OTHERS JOBS IN A SYSTEM THAT

WAS SUPPOSED TO INTEGRATE

THEM. WHAT WE TRIED TO LOOK AT WAS

WHAT IS THE SOLUTION HERE?

GET THEM OUT OF THE PRIVATE

HEALTH INSURANCE -- WHO IS

GOING TO DESIGN THIS DOWNED

ROAD? IT IS GOING TO BE D H F.

WHO IS GOING TO BE FIGURING

THIS OUT. THE EYE DID IDEA IS

THE COUNTY; THAT'S HOW WE'RE

SET UP IN THE STATE. THEY HAD

DONE THIS TEN YEARS AGO;

THEY'LL DO IT TEN YEARS FROM

NOW. THEY'RE GOING TO BE

TASKED WITH THAT JOB. AS

I TRAY VERY -- TRAY TRAVEL

AROUND THE STATE -- THOSE SAME

FAMILIES WILL KNEAD NEED THAT

HELP. WHAT THIS BILL SAYS IS

THAT IT'S THE COUNTIES BECAUSE

THEY'RE CLOSEST. NOW; THE TWO

MAIN IDEAS OF THIS; THIS

WOULD BE AT THE PHASE WHERE YOU HAVE

A MARKER AND DIAGRAMMING THE

BUILDING; THAT'S THE PHASE

WHERE THIS IS

AT. THAT'S THE IDEA WITH THIS BILL.

HERE COMES ANOTHER IDEA FROM

GOVERNMENT THAT IS SUPPOSED

HELP US. I DO NOT FAULT THEM

MORE BEING SKEPTICAL. WITH

THAT; THOSE ARE THE TWO MAIN

IDEAS BE HIND THIS BILL. SO

IN A NUTSHELL; THAT IS THE

BILL.

>>: SO I'M ONE OF THOSE

BROKERS THAT HAD THOSE

MEETINGS. WE WERE FRUFT

RATED. IT'S BEEN A FRUSTRATING

PROCESS.

WHAT WE DO; THE PROCESS HAS

CHANGED FOR US TOO. WE USED TO

ENROLL PEOPLE IN THE MEDI-CAID

PROGRAM WHEN WE SHOULDN'T

HAVE. WE VET THE PEOPLE NOW ON THE

PHONE. WE'RE GETTING THESE

PEOPLE THROUGH THE WEB SITE AND

THE COUNTY. THEY'RE SENDING

THEM OUR WAY. WE VET THEM ON

THE PHONE. SHOULD THEY COME TO

US OR DO WE SEND THEM TO THE

PROPER PERSON?

OUR EXPERIENCE TODAY IS MUCH

DIFFER RENT.

>>: THANK YOU FOR YOUR

TESTIMONY. ANY QUESTIONS FOR

-- SEEING NONE. TESTIFY --

>>: GOOD MORNING. WE'RE AN

OFFICIALAL PARTNER. OUR

ENROLLMENT CENTER SEVERSS

MORE THAN 25 THOUSAND A YEAR.

AS I SAID WE COLLABORATE. WE

WORK CLOSELY WITH THE COUNTIES

AND WITH OTHER PARTNERS. MORE

THAN 20 ;000 ARE HELPED. THIS

WOULD NOT HAVE BEEN POSSIBLE

WITHOUT THE GRANTS THAT WE GET

WHICH HELP US GO OUT AND

EDUCATE THE PUBLIC. WE WORK

EVERY DAY; WE'RE OPEN YEAR

AROUND. THE COUNTY IS OUR

LARGEST REFERRAL. SOMETHING

THAT WE DO ON A DAILY BASIS. I

CAN TELL YOU THAT THIS YEAR WAS

OUR MOST SUCCESSFUL YEAR YET.

IT'S WORKING BETTER THAN EVER

IN SERVING THE UNIQUE NEEDS OF

MINNESOTA.

60 PERCENT OF -- TAX CREDITS

THAT -- SAVE OFFER 3 HUNDRED

$300 MILL WHY NOT IN TAX

CREDITS. WHEN WE CALL TO GE

T SOMETHING DONE; HELP THEM

CHANGE A PASSWORD; HELP THEM

WITH THE APPLICATION. IT'S DO

NOT IN TEN MINUTES. WE KNOW

FIRSTHAND HOW FARRO HAS COME.

IT'S REALLY IMPAIR -- TO BUILD

ON THE SERVICES THAT THEY HAVE

COME TO RELY ON. AS YOU KNOW

YOU SAW ONE OF THE SURVEYS THAT

CAME OUT. MORE AND MORE PEOPLE

ARE INVOLVED. BECAUSE OF THE

SYSTEM AND PROGRAM. AND MANY

OF THESE PEOPLE WOULDN'T HAVE

INSURANCE. THIS BILL IS A

SOLUTION IN SEARCH OF A --

CREATING A NEW I T SYSTEM IS A

WASTE. NOW IS NOT THE TIME TO

GO BACKWARDS SO I'M HERE TO

TELL YOU THAT. WE'RE HERE

WITNESSING IT. WE PUT IN ALL

THAT WE COULD AND WE SHOULD NOT

GO BACKWARDS AND DESTROY WHAT

WE BUILT.

>>: QUESTIONS FROM MEMBERS.

>>: THANK YOU MR. CHAIR. I

SEE A DIFFERENT POINT OF

VIEW. THEY GIVE UP. IF IT BECOMES A

LOSS; WHAT HAPPENS TO ABREVA?

>>: THEY DON'T GO ALL OVER THE

PLACE. THEY KNOW A

TRUSTED RESOURCE THAT CAN SERVE THEM IN

MULTIPLE LANGUAGES. WE SERVE

ALL OVER THE STATE. WE HAVE AN

ONLINE SYSTEM. WE'VE DONE IT

MORE THAN EVER IN THIS OPEN

ENROLLMENT.

>>: TODAY IS THE FIRST TIME

THAT I HEARD OF A BREEFB -- A

ABREVA.

>>: ABREVA WILL EXIST BECAUSE

WE PROVIDE THESE SERVICES. I'M

PRETTY SURE THAT THOSE 30

;000 PEOPLE WOULD BE DEVASTATED THAT

THEY WOULD NOT HAVE ANYWHERE TO

GO AND THEY WOULD HAVE TO

RELEARN SOMETHING. IT TOOK US

YEARS TO GO OUT THERE AND SHOW

THEM HOW TO SIGN UP. WE'RE

SIGNING UP PEOPLE WHO HAVE

NEVER HAD HEALTH INSURANCE

BEFORE.

>>: SO YOU SERVE THE

FUNCTION OF NAVIGATOR. HOW

EASY IS IT TO FIND A NAVIGATOR

IN THE STATE?

>>: WE WOULD GO OUT THERE AND

DO AN OUTREACH AND THEY WOULD

LEARN HOW TO GET TO US. WE

DISTRIBUTE MATERIALS. THE

OTHER OPTION IS THERE IS A

WEB SITE. AND THEN THE COUNTY

-- WE HAVE BECOME A

RESOURCE FOR THE COUNTY. THERE ARE

THOUSANDS OF PEOPLE THAT WOULD

SHOW UP SO IF THEY CAN'T HANDLE

IT THEY SEND PEOPLE TO US. WE

HAVE REFERRAL PARTNERS.

>>: THANK YOU. I HEAR THAT

SOUNDS LIKE MY COMMUNITY.

THERE ARE NAVIGATORS IN FOOD

SHELTERS -- AM I HEARING YOU

CORRECTLY IN SAYING THAT PEOPLE

MAY NOT ACCESS ENROLLMENT

HEALTH IN THEIR LANGUAGE AND

IT'S COMMUNITY PLACES THAT THEY

TRUST?

>>: YES. WE HAVE I THINK

OVER 100

ORGANIZATIONS ALL OFFER THE STATE THAT PROVIDE

SERVICE IN DIFFERENT

LANGUAGES. THAT WOULD NOT BE POSSIBLE

IF PEOPLE HAVE TO GO THREW --

THROUGH THE COUNTY. ITS UNIQUE

TO THE NEED OF SPECK I SPECK

POPULATIONS.

>>: I'M WONDERING WHAT --

YOU TO START THIS?

>>: BECOMING A BRIDGE IN

SPECIALLY HARD TO REACH

COMMUNITIES. WE FELT THERE WAS

A NEED TO BRIDGE THAT GAP.

SO THAT'S HOW WE STARTED

INITIALLY. THEN WE -- WITH

THE LAUNCH. WE ARE A FOR

PROFIT; SMALL COMPANY.

>>: SO YOU ARE FOR PROFIT.

YOU HAVE A PROFIT AND LOSS

STATEMENT THAT YOU LOOK AT.

I'M CURIOUS IN TERMS OF YOUR

GRANT THAT YOU

RECEIVE. HOW DID YOU SAY THAT PLAY OUT? IT

IS ONGOING OR ONE TIME?

>>: THE GRANT IS ONGOING. TO

GIVE YOU A QUICK HISTORY WE

STARTED WITH A SMALL GRANT.

130 ;000 .

ENROLLMENT LAST YEAR WE HELPED

MORE THAN 13 ;000.

WE WENT FROM SPENDING MAYBE 80

.

>>: SO IF I WERE TO LOOK AT

YOUR PROFIT AND LOSS; YOUR

RELIANCE ON THE GRANT IS NOT A

SMALL A MOUNT. WHAT PER -- OF

YOUR PROFIT AND LOSS

STATEMENT. >>: ITS ABOUT MAYBE 40

PERCENT. THIS IS A GRANT; WE

SPEND 100 PERCENT OF IT RUNNING

THE PROGRAM. ALL OF THOSE

ENROLLMENTS THAT WE DO WE --

FOR US THAT IS WHERE WE HOPE TO

GET A PROFIT. I WAS LOOKING AT

OUR PROFITS LAST YEAR. WE

ALMOST SPENT EVERYTHING. 70

;000. WE'RE PROCESSING SO MANY

PEOPLE AND THE PER ENROLLMENT

RATE THAT WE GET -- WE'RE

FUNCTIONING LIKE A NO -- NONE

PROFIT.

>>: YOUR RELIANCE AT STATE;

YOUR RELYING MORE THAN THAT --

YOU EVEN SAID THAT IF THE

COUNTIES WERE;ABLE TO PROCESS

THOSE ON THEIR OWN. IF THE

COUNTIES HAD A PROGRAM THAT

DIDN'T REQUIRE AN OUTSIDE

VENDOR. IF 340 $340;000 WASN'T

EXPENDED OUTSIDE. IF WE HAD A

PROGRAM THAT SERVED THE PEOPLE

IN THE STATE OF MINNESOTA THAT

DIDN'T REQUIRE EXTRA PEOPLE TO

GET THE HELP THAT THEY NEED.

>>: THANK YOU. SO KIND OF

LIKE WHAT I'M HEARING IS THAT

WE HAVE A -- THAT FOUR OR FIVE

YEARS AGO CAME TO THE

REALIZATION OF TECHNICAL

PROBLEMS AND HAS BECOME MORE

EFFICIENT. THE ONE THING I

THINK THAT WE KNOW ABOUT IN

COUNTIES AND STATES IS THAT

THEY CANNOT DO THE WORK TO

REACH OUT -- FOR SOME REASON

THEY ARE NOTABLE TO DO THE WORK

THAT NEEDS TO BE DO NOT IN THE

LANGUAGE; COMMUNITIES THE WAY

THAT AN OUTSIDE VENDOR CAN DO.

I HEARD THE AWESOME WORK THAT

THEY'RE DOING. TO MAKE SURE

THAT FAMILIES ARE GETTING THE

SERVICES THAT THEY NEED.

AND HAS DO NOT A WONDERFUL JOB OF

OUTREACH TO MAKE SURE THAT THEY

ARE CONNECTING. THE COUNTIES

ARE PARTNERING WITH AN OUTSIDE

VENDOR. AS WE LOOK AT; WE WONT

TO CREATE A WHOLE NEW SYSTEM

THAT MAKES IT MORE DIFFICULT;

TO LOOK AT SOMETHING NEW. MY

QUESTION TO REPRESENTATIVE

DEAN; SOME TIMES PEOPLE MOEFB

MOVE FROM COUNTY TO COUNTY.

THEY DO IT HOWEVER THEY WANT TO

DO IT WITHOUT BEING;ABLE TO

SUPPORT. ANY TIME SOMETHING

NEW HAPPENS IT TAKES TIME TO BE

EFFECTIVE.

>>: THE ANSWER IS WE DON'T

HAVE SUCH AN AWESOME TRACK

RECORD FOR I T PROGRAM

ENROLLMENT. BEFORE I GOT LET

THE ELECTED THERE WAS

SOMETHING CALLED HEALTH MATCH.

THEY JUST IMPOSED THIS I

T SYSTEM ON THE STATE. THERE WAS

NO BACK UP AND NO NET. SO ALL

OF THE PEOPLE THAT COULDN'T GET

SERVED; COUNTIES HAD TO HIRE

PEOPLE TO GET CAUGHT UP. IT

STILL DOESN'T WORK. WE'RE

GOING TO FIND OUT THAT

THEY'RE GOING TO BE SPENDING HUNDRED

OF MILL I -- LETS GET THE

RIGHT VOICES AND NOT PULL THE

RUG OUT FROM UNDERNEATH THE

COUNTY. THAT'S THE IDEA.

>>: WE HAVE 12 MINUTES LEFT

>>: WE WERE UP AGAINST A

FEDERAL MANDATE TO GET THE

DOLLARS THAT WE NEEDED.

HERE WE ARE YEARS LATER.

ANYTHING NEW TAKES TIME. THE

THING IS WHAT DO WE LEARN? I

HEARD THAT YOU'RE GOING TO PUT

A GROUP TOGETHER AND TAKE YOUR

TIME TO MAKE IT HAPPEN. SO WE

WANT TO REPEAL STATUTES AND

RULES. WHAT DID THAT LOOK LIKE

REPRESENTATIVE DEAN?

>>: SECTION 4 -- IN ORDER TO

DO THAT WOULD ALLOW STATE

FLEXIBILITY. ALLOW US TO

CONTINUE TO USE WHAT WE HAVE

UNTIL WE HAVE

SOMETHING BETTER. >>: IS THERE A -- ASSOCIATED

WITH THIS?

>>: THE COST WITH IN THAT

EXISTING A -- WE'RE GOING TO

LOOK AT HOW THOSE MONEYS ARE

GOING TO BE SPENT. THAT MAKES

SENSE; SOMETHING THAT IS GOING

TO LAST.

>>: MY HOPE IS THAT WE HAVE A

SMALL BUSINESS IN FRONT OF US

WHO HAS DONE A GREAT JOB; IN MY

HOPE IS THAT WE'RE NOT HERE TO

ATTACK THE GREAT WORK THAT THE

BUSINESS IS DOING; BUT SEE THE

VALUE THAT SHE HAS BROUGHT INTO

A SYSTEM THAT MANY OF US HAVE

THOUGHT WAS BROKEN. THAT WE

RECOGNIZE THAT SHE IS A JOB

CREATOR. FROM WHAT I HEAR IS

WORKING EXTREMELY HARD

AND DID YOU SAY NOT RECEIVE MUCH OF A

PROFIT. I THINK THAT'S A JOB

WELL DONE. I WANT TO THANK YOU

FOR YOUR SERVICE.

>>: MR. CHAIR; I'M CONFUSED

BECAUSE I THOUGHT THIS

BILL WAS ABOUT HAVING A WORKING SYSTEM.

WE HEARD ABOUT ENROLLMENT; THE

PERCENT OF -- FROM

NONFUNCTION -- BASICALLY THIS

BILL IS AIMED AT THE USER

BEINGABLE TO DEFINE A SYSTEM

THAT WORKS. I WOULD LOVE TO

HEAR YOUR COUNTY PEOPLE WHO

DON'T HAVE A PROBLEM WITH THE

SYSTEM AND THEN I'LL JOIN YOU.

BUT OUR CITIZENS DESERVE THEIR

COUNTIES THAT HAVE TOOLS THAT

WORK FOR THEM. SOMETHING THAT

FUNCTIONS. ACTUALLY

FUNCTIONS. YOU CAN DO THIS IN MONTHS IN

THE REAL WORLD. IF YOU DON'T

REQUIRE SECONDARY COMPANIES.

>>: THANK YOU. IT'S BEEN A

LITTLE BIT HARD TO DISEN LISTEN

TO THIS CONVERSATION. I HOPE

MEMBERS AREN'T IN TENDING TO GO

DOWN THAT ROAD. I SUGGEST THAT

-- THEY DID START OUT WITH

DIFFICULTY; IT'S NOT PERFECT.

WE DON'T NEED TO ATTACK THE

MESSENGER HERE. THINK ABOUT WE

HAVE A COMPLICATED SYSTEM OF

MAKING SURE THAT PEOPLE HAVE

INSURANCE TO MAKE SURE THAT

THEY HAVE HEALTH

CARE. YOU DO NEED A LOT OF OUTSIDE HELP

WITH.

I THINK REPRESENTATIVE DEAN

KNOWS WHERE I'M GOING WITH

THIS. IF WE WANT A SYSTEM THAT

DOESN'T TAKE ODDS OUT HELP.

WE SHOULD GET RID OF THE

INSURANCE. PEOPLE WOULDN'T

HAVE THIS COMPLICATED POINT.

WE DO ALL OF THESE THINGS AND

HAVE THIS LAYER TO MAKE THIS

THING WORK THAT ISN'T EVEN

ABOUT HEALTH CARE. WE NEED A

ONE POOL SYSTEM. WE WOULDN'T

HAVE TO SEND THIS TO THE

COUNTY. SOMEBODY WITH A RARE

DID -- DISEASE SHOULD HAVE

HEALTH CARE. IN THE

MEANTIME WHEN WE HAVE THE SYSTEM THAT WE

GOT; ITS WORKING BETTER.

>>: THANK YOU. I KNOW YOU'RE

TRYING TO HELP PEOPLE WHO FIND

THEMSELVES IN A DIFFICULT

SITUATION.

I DO SUPPORT REPRESENTATIVE

DEANS BILL. A KOUFL COUPLE

THINGS I WANT TO BRING UP.

WE'RE GOING BACKWARDS IN THAT

AREA. PEOPLE COULD NOT AFFORD

IT. I HAVE MORE PEOPLE

CANCELLING. PEOPLE ARE JUST

SAYING THAT'S ENOUGH. THE

BIGGEST THING WE'RE DOING IS

EXPANDING GOVERNMENT HEALTH

CARE. GOVERNMENT HEALTH CARE

UNDER PAYS PROVIDERS. I HAVE

CRITICAL ACTS OF COST -- I SAID

HOW ARE THINGS GOING? SHE SAID

WE HAVE TO SAVE MONEY. THE

FACILITY IS UNDER PRESSURE

FINANCIALLY. WE'RE DAMAGING

ONE OF THE BEST HEALTH

CARE SYSTEMS IN THE WORLD. IF WE'RE

EXPANDING YOU'RE GOING TO

SEE LESS ACCESS. PEOPLE WERE

WAITING 40 DAYS TO SEE A

GENERAL PRACTITIONER. ITS

GOING TO DAMAGE ACCESS AND THE

I -- AND NOT MAKE IT BETTER.

IT HAS TO BE REPLACED WITH

PRIVATE SECTORS. WE CAN BRING

THE COST DOWN. WE HAD A 9

NINE PERCENT UNIN SURED RATE. WE

HAD A 3 THREE PERCENT -- AFTER

SPENDING. ALL WE HAD TO DO WAS

TWEAK OUR SYSTEM AND WE WOULD

HAVE TAKEN CARE OF THAT 3 THREE

PERCENT.

I COULD KEEP GOING ON.

>>: THANK YOU

FOR YOUR TESTIMONY TODAY.

>>: PLEASE RECONSIDER YOUR

POSITION.

>>: WELCOME. I AM THE DIRECT

OR OF MINNESOTA COUNTIES. I

DON'T GET HERE OFTEN. I WILL

BE BRIEF. I KNOW MANY OF YOU

HAVE SAT WITH YOUR

COUNTY WORKERS AND SEEN

THE CHALLENGES THAT TLAR FACING.

WE HAVE SOME QUESTIONS ABOUT THIS PROPOSAL.

WE BELIEVE THESE SYSTEMS

DO HAVE TO BE TESTED OUT AND

COUNTIES NEED TO BE AT THE

TABLE IN DEVELOPING THEM. WE

DO HAVE A NUMBER OF QUESTIONS

AND -- RIGHT NOW THERE IS NO

GREAT MECHANIC -- HOW WE WOULD

OWN; OPERATE AND MAINTAIN IT.

BUT WE ARE CONCERNED ABOUT

COUNTIES BEING PLACED IN A

DIFFICULT SITUATION; TRYING TO

OPERATE

AND MAINTAIN SYSTEMS. WE'VE BEEN HERE BEFORE. WE DO

WANT TO WORK TOGETHER. IT DID

YOU SAY NO GOOD TO EXPEND

RESOURCES TO TRY AND MAKE

SYSTEMS THAT SHOULD MAKE OUR

LIFE EASIER. TOMORROW IS

COUNTY DAY HERE. I'D ASK YOU

TO REACH OUT TO YOUR LOCAL

FOLKS ABOUT THIS PROPOSAL AND

OTHER TECH ISSUES.

>>: MEMBERS; ANY FINAL WORDS?

>>: TOMORROW TALK TO YOUR

COUNTIES.

>>: THANK YOU REPRESENTATIVE

DEAN.

>>: WITH THAT REPRESENTATIVE

DEAN RENEWS HIS MOTION. MOTION

PREVAILS. WITH THAT WE ARE

Không có nhận xét nào:

Đăng nhận xét