Thứ Tư, 1 tháng 11, 2017

Auto news on Youtube Nov 1 2017

"hog sound"

Hey, guys, Professor Bill of Comic Book University and I'm going to explain Professor Pyg in about a minute.

Professor Pyg's first appearance was in "Batman #666" in July 2007 and he was created by Grant Morrison and Andy Kubert.

Pyg is Lazlo Valentin, a brilliant chemist who worked for Spyral, the organization that Dick Grayson became a spy for.

Lazlo developed a chemical that could control minds.

He experimented on himself, often, and this contributed in driving him insane.

Pyg is a horror-show of a character who kidnaps people, operates on them, and exposes them to his mind-control chemicals.

He calls the result of these experiments "Dollotrons, and they are lobotomized, genderless, automatons with doll masks surgically grafted to their faces and brains, making reversal surgery impossible without killing the victim.

They follow his every word and they can be dreadfully silent, allowing dozens, even hundreds of Dollotrons to sneak up and surround a target.

He is the mastermind behind the "Circus of the Strange", a cult-like criminal gang.

He has a son named Janosz Valentin, aka Johnny Valentine, who refers to himself as the Son of Pyg.

Janosz is a precision marksman with firearms and is capable of shutting down his own pain receptors, allowing him to ignore pain.

The spelling of Pyg's name is a callback to Morrison's inspiration for the character, "Pygmalion", a play by George Bernard Shaw, that deals with the search for perfection.

And that's Professor Pyg in about a minute.

For more infomation >> Professor Pyg (Explained in a Minute) | COMIC BOOK UNIVERSITY - Duration: 1:26.

-------------------------------------------

University of Chicago announces $125 million gift to support economic scholarship - Duration: 0:57.

The Griffin gift will play a major role to affecting society in the best possible ways

we can.

We can go on and on and on and think about

what have economists done over the last century, and nearly every major innovation would include

some direct link to Chicago economics.

We have theories like rational expectations - that's Bob Lucas.

Monetary economics – Milton Friedman.

We can think about social economics or family economics – well that's Gary Becker.

But when I think about what can Ken's gift do, when I say game-changer, I mean it.

When we fast forward 50 or 100 years, we're going to look back and we're going to say:

The 21st century, do you know what that was?

That was a ton of economic innovation, and the Chicago School of Economics was at the

center of it.

For more infomation >> University of Chicago announces $125 million gift to support economic scholarship - Duration: 0:57.

-------------------------------------------

WHY I BELIEVE A UNIVERSITY COLLEGE EDUCATION & CORPORATE MEDIA ARE RESPONSIBLE FOR BRAINWASHING THE - Duration: 12:14.

WHY I BELIEVE A UNIVERSITY COLLEGE EDUCATION & CORPORATE MEDIA ARE RESPONSIBLE FOR BRAINWASHING

THE MASSES

BY ARJUN WALIA

A declassified document from the CIA archives in the form of a letter from a CIA task force

addressed to the Director of the Central Intelligence Agency details the close relationship that

exists between the CIA and mainstream media and academia.

The document states that the CIA task force �now has relationships with reporters from

every major wire service, newspaper, news weekly, and television network in the nation,�

and that �this has helped us turn some �intelligence failure� stories into �intelligence success�

stories,� and has contributed to the accuracy of countless others.� Furthermore, it explains

how the agency has �persuaded reporters to postpone, change, hold, or even scrap stories

that could have adversely affected national security interests or jeopardized sources

and methods.�

Although it is a document outlining their desire to become more open and transparent,

the deception outlined by various whistleblowers (example) requires us to read between the

lines and recognize that the relationships shared between intelligence agencies and our

sources of information are not always warranted and pose inherent conflicts of interest.

Herein lies the problem: What is �national security,� and who determines that definition?

JFK bravely told the world that the �dangers of excessive and unwarranted concealment of

pertinent facts far outweigh[] the dangers which are cited to justify it.� He also

said that �there is very grave danger that an announced need for increased security will

be seized upon by those anxious to expand its meaning to the very limits of official

censorship and concealment.�

�National security� is now an umbrella term used to justify concealing information,

but who makes these decisions? You can read more about our world of secrecy and the Black

Budget here.

Not only are countless documents classified every single year in North America, but false

information and �fake news� are routinely dispersed, mainly by mainstream media outlets

� a reality that is clearly conveyed in this document and has been expressed by multiple

mainstream media journalists themselves. And as with the NSA surveillance program that

was exposed by Edward Snowden, it�s a global problem.

Dr. Udo Ulfkotte, a prominent German journalist and editor for more than two decades, is one

example. He blew the whistle on public television, stating that he was forced to publish the

works of intelligence agencies under his own name and that noncompliance with these orders

would result in him losing his job.

Sharyl Attkisson and Amber Lyon, both well-known mainstream media reporters and journalists,

have also exposed funded movements by political, corporate, and other special interests, and

have revealed that they are routinely paid by the U.S. government as well as foreign

governments to selectively report and distort information on certain events.

Let�s not forget about Operation Mockingbird, a CIA-based initiative to control mainstream

media.

The document not only outlines the CIA�s role in media, but also the entire entertainment

industry in general, lending further weight to revelations offered by celebrities like

Jim Carrey. He appeared as a guest on Jimmy Kimmel Live, saying that, �For years now,

talk show hosts, people on television, people in sitcoms have been, hired by the government

to throw you off the tracks, to distract you, to make you laugh and stuff like that, make

you happy and docile so you don�t know what�s really going on.�

While some question whether he was merely joking, the facts still remain. Another celebrity,

who was clearly serious, is Roseanne Barr, who referenced the CIA�s MK Ultra mind control

program � a previously classified research program through the CIA�s scientific intelligence

division that tested behavioural modification and perception manipulation on human beings.

What we seem to have here is an attempt to manipulate public perception of global events

through mainstream media and news publications. But what�s perhaps most interesting is the

fact that a lot of people are now waking up and seeing through many of these lies and

manipulation tactics. Instead of just blindly believing what we hear on television, more

people are starting to think critically, do independent research, and examine a wide array

of sources and information.

So many opportunities have emerged within the past few years allowing others to see

this more clearly. One was the recent �fake news� epidemic, where evidence surfaced

exposing information that threatened the global elite. Wikileaks is perhaps one of the greatest

examples. For mainstream media to basically label everything else as �fake news� was

quite ironic, given that it seems the majority of people consider mainstream media themselves

to be the real �fake news,� and this is now even more evident given the information

presented above in this article.

The documents also touch upon the fact that they are constantly in touch with the entertainment

industry, giving advice on scenes and direction, as well as how things happened in certain

situations. Personally, I feel the industry is largely used to push propaganda, like patriotism.

Patriotism is pumped into the population to support a large military in the name of �national

security.� We are being fooled, wars are not waged for defence, but for offence and

to push forth political agendas.

So you see, there are multiple reasons for these CIA connections to various industries.

Academia

From a young age we�re taught that getting an education is the key to living a good life.

Getting a decent job, making good money, even finding the right partner � all depend on

following a certain path. Yet many concepts and topics are, as previously illustrated,

kept from public viewing, and this includes plenty of important science.

The U.S. intelligence community investigated parapsychology (ESP, remote viewing, telepathy,

etc.) for more than two decades, for instance. Russell Targ, a physicist who has spent several

decades working in a U.S. government program exploring these concepts, recently shared

his experience doing so in a TED talk that is now approaching 1 million views.

Another great example of Black Budget science comes from Ben Rich, the second director of

Lockheed Skunkworks, who worked there from 1975-1991. He�s been called the Father of

Stealth, having overseen the development of the first stealth fighter, the F-117 Nighthawk.

Before his death, Rich made several shocking open statements about the reality of UFOs

and extraterrestrials.

�We already have the means to travel among the stars, but these technologies are locked

up in black projects, and it would take an act of God to ever get them out to benefit

humanity. Anything you can imagine, we already know how to do it.�

�We now have technology to take ET home. No it won�t take someone�s lifetime to

do it. There is an error in the equations. We know what it is. We now have the capability

to travel to the stars.�

�There are two types of UFOs � the ones we build and the ones �they� build.�

To read more about those comments and examine the sources, you can refer to this article

that goes into more detail about it.

Information like this, including testimony from hundreds of others, suggests that the

�classified world� is much more advanced than our mainstream one.

This particular document states that the agency exposes administrators of academic institutions

to the agency on a regular basis.

Obviously, as with any other job, the CIA would be looking for what they consider to

be qualified individuals. But the document does outline its close relationship with academia

in general.

This is because certain developments and information that stem from academia could threaten national

security and therefore must be kept out of the curriculum, and the public domain.

Take, for example, documents obtained via the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) that

reveal how the U.S. government has been using a secret system to withhold the approval of

some applications.

This 50-page document was obtained by Kilpatrick Towsend & Stockton, LLP, who commonly represent

major tech companies that include Apple, Google, and Twitter (to name a few). You can view

that entire document here. (source)

The program delaying patent applications is called the Sensitive Application Warning System

(SWAS). Usually when an application is submitted for a patent approval, it requires a couple

of examiners who work with the Patent Office to go through their process of approval. This

process usually takes one to two years, but applications that are filed in SAWS must be

approved from several people, and can be delayed for a number of years.

One great example (out of many) of delayed patent applications comes from Dr. Gerald

F. Ross, who filed a patent application for a new invention he had devised to defeat the

jamming of electromagnetic transmissions at specified frequencies. It was not until June

17, 2014 (almost 37 years later) that this patent was granted.

It�s important to note (as reported by the Federation of American Scientists � see

annotated bibliography) that there were over 5,000 inventions that were under secrecy orders

at the end of fiscal year 2014, which marked the highest number of secrecy orders in effect

since 1994.

Steven Aftergood from the Federation of American Scientists reports:

The 1971 list indicates that patents for solar photovoltaic generators were subject to review

and possible restriction if the photovoltaics were more than 20% efficient. Energy conversion

systems were likewise subject to review and possible restriction if they offered conversion

efficiencies �in excess of 70-80%.�

This is all thanks to an act many people are unaware of. It�s called the �Invention

Secrecy Act,� and it was written in 1951. Under this act, patent applications on new

inventions can be subject to secrecy orders, which can restrict their publication if government

agencies believe that their disclosure would be harmful to national security.

Final Thoughts

So, as you see, science and academia in the mainstream world can only go so far. We continue

to rely on government institutions to define truth and reality for us, to outline the limits

of what is possible. In many instances, these places to which we go to �learn� are actually

diminishing, not supporting, our creativity and critical thinking skills. That�s not

to say that there aren�t good aspects of the experience, but overall, we are not accessing

our full potential.

When information is hidden from us as well as manipulated at the same time, it�s only

going to spark more curiosity among the people. And that�s one aspect of the current shift

in consciousness that�s happening on our planet. We�re beginning to see the human

experience in a different light, and starting to recognize that the time for change

is really here. What are we going to do about it?

For more infomation >> WHY I BELIEVE A UNIVERSITY COLLEGE EDUCATION & CORPORATE MEDIA ARE RESPONSIBLE FOR BRAINWASHING THE - Duration: 12:14.

-------------------------------------------

University of Chicago Student Pushed To The Ground, Robbed - Duration: 0:49.

For more infomation >> University of Chicago Student Pushed To The Ground, Robbed - Duration: 0:49.

-------------------------------------------

Robbie Baxter | "The Membership Economy" | Singularity University - Duration: 5:57.

(music)

- So Robbie, first of all, what is The Membership Economy?

We've heard about it from American Express,

they're probably the most well known

for the Membership Plan.

- So, it's a massive transformational trend

that I've seen with virtually every industry,

from software, to hospitality, to financial services,

and it's all about a move from ownership to access,

from anonymous transactions to known relationships,

and from one-way communication where

you're just pushing messages at your customer

to an open conversation,

not just between you and the consumer,

but also among the customers themselves under your umbrella.

- So this sounds like this is a fundamental strategy shift.

I mean, really a very different way of thinking about

how you engage with customers

at every aspect of your business.

- Yeah, absolutely.

It's about putting the customer

at the center of everything you do

instead of the product or the processes

or even the technology.

- Tell us about some of the core elements

that are enabling this transformation to happen

around membership.

- So membership is not new, right?

I mean we've had membership since the 12th century,

trade guilds and religious groups.

But what's happened recently, two big things.

One of them is that technology

has extended the infrastructure

that enables trusting relationships.

So, we've always wanted to have

these long-term relationships

with the companies that serve us,

but now it's possible to do that

not just with companies that we know personally

like the shop around the corner,

but actually with organizations

where we've never met anybody.

And these are through technologies

like always-on devices, mobility,

artificial intelligence that gives us

a personalized experience; the ability to connect networks.

All of that is enabling new ways of relating.

The other thing is, the influx of financial capital,

that is giving entrepreneurs a longer runway

to build relationships with their customers

before they actually have to generate revenue.

- So, the fact that we are always connected,

and we have so many different ways to connect,

is enabling these organizations to think differently

about how to be a part of those connections.

- Yeah, it's like a new palette of colors

that you can use when you're painting your business model.

- I love that; can you give us some examples

about some companies that have taken advantage

of this new palette?

- Yeah, well there's two groups;

there's what I think of as the digital natives,

the Amazons, LinkedIn, Netflix,

who started their businesses thinking about

the forever transaction, thinking about

this longterm, member-oriented approach.

And then there are companies that have transformed

to membership models, companies like Intuit and Adobe,

who have moved from these anonymous box transactions

to a real ongoing relationship, subscription model community

with the people they serve.

- So Robbie, you know that at Singularity University

we spend a lot of time talking about impact.

Does the membership economy work in the social sector?

Are there other examples that you've seen of organizations

that are not necessarily in the corporate world,

that are using this strategy?

- Yeah.

Well you guys talk a lot about grand challenges,

and one organization that I work with,

the American Nurses Association,

has a grand challenge going on right now

where they're focused on

helping the 3.5 million nurses in the US get healthy.

Because nurses are among,

on the five major elements of health, which is like,

stress, sleep, weight, smoking, and I think drugs, maybe.

I think those are the five.

They perform less well than

the American population at large, in four out of five.

So they're really using, they're using online community,

they're using their subscription model,

they're using their live events,

all to support this initiative,

this grand challenge around making nurses

as healthy as possible this year.

- I think that all leaders are gonna need

to really take a hard look at their business model.

What suggestions would you have for leaders

that want to really understand how

to get into the membership economy,

and how to make sure that they really

are getting their leadership team prepared

for thinking very differently about strategy?

- So I think the first thing is to get them out talking

to customers, and really understanding

what is the value that they provide?

What is the, you know as Clayton Christian says,

"What's the job that your product does for them?"

And that's one piece.

Also, getting into their shoes and understanding

what technologies they expect and see as the new normal.

And the other thing

is not getting too wrapped up in the technology.

Because even though technology is great,

it's not great when it's not in service

to an actual benefit,

for the person you're trying to serve, the customer.

- So how do we become more curious?

How should we look at new businesses?

What are some questions we should ask?

- That's a good question.

So, becoming more curious is, it's innate.

We all are curious.

If you get back,

if you've been with a four year old recently,

you know we are born to ask questions.

And over time I think we get embarrassed about it,

or we think we know too much.

So, what I'd suggest is, ask questions, look at businesses,

think to yourself, why is this business successful?

What can I learn from this business?

And putting things together, a lot of people have said

to me, we want to be the Netflix of our industry.

And on some level you can't copy an organization.

On the other hand, if you say, what would that look like?

So you'd ask the second question.

So okay, great.

What would it look like

if you're the Netflix of your industry?

What would that be?

If you Amazoned your competitors, what would that mean?

And so sometimes, just asking the second question

is a great way to really break open the paradigm.

- Great, well so many wonderful things

that you have to share.

Go and talk to customers.

Ask better questions.

Try to understand which organizations

are doing well, and why.

Be curious about it.

For more infomation >> Robbie Baxter | "The Membership Economy" | Singularity University - Duration: 5:57.

-------------------------------------------

Carnegie Mellon University | Behavioral Economics | Work That Matters - Duration: 0:31.

In a society facing overwhelming challenges,

why do we keep making the same irrational decisions?

Why to we repeat destructive behaviors?

At Carnegie Mellon University, as pioneers of behavioral economics,

we are advancing decision-making science.

Our distinct fusion of economics and psychology is reducing teen pregnancy.

Simplifying health care and battling economic injustices.

We don't just study behavior, we change it.

We do the work that matters.

For more infomation >> Carnegie Mellon University | Behavioral Economics | Work That Matters - Duration: 0:31.

-------------------------------------------

Robbie Baxter | "The Membership Economy" | Singularity University - Duration: 15:29.

(music)

- I am so excited for this conversation I'm about to have

with Robbie Kellman Baxter, who is a management consultant

and the author of the book, "The Membership Economy: Find

Your Super Users, Master the Forever Transaction, and

Build Recurring Revenue".

And we're going to talk a little bit about a question

that's on a lot of people's minds right now, which is

how you create a business model that keeps you sustainable,

that keeps revenue coming in, and most important, keeps

you actively engaged with your customers.

Robbie, thank you so much for coming here.

- Oh, thanks for having me, Lisa.

- It's really exciting.

So Robbie, first of all, what is the Membership Economy?

We've heard about it from American Express

- Yeah

- They're probably the most well known for their membership

play.

- Right, membership has it's privileges.

- Yes, exactly.

- So, it's a massive transformational trend that I've seen

with virtually every industry, from software to hospitality

to financial services.

And it's all about a move from ownership to access.

From anonymous transactions to known relationships.

And from one-way communication, where you're just pushing

messages at your customer, to an open conversation.

Not just between you and the consumer, but also among the

customers themselves, under your umbrella.

- So this sounds like this is a fundamental strategy shift.

I mean really a very different way of thinking about how

you engage with customers in every aspect of your business.

- Yeah, absolutely.

It's about putting the customer at the center of everything

you do, instead of the product, or the processes, or even

the technology.

- So what's so special about it now?

So we're here at the Global Summit, we're talking a lot

about exponential technology.

- Yep.

- Tell us about some of the core elements that are enabling

this transformation to happen around membership.

- Yeah, well so membership is not new, right?

I mean, we've had memberships since the 12th Century,

Trade guilds and religious groups, but what's happened

recently, two big things.

One of them is that technology has extended the

infrastructure that enables trusting relationships.

So we've always wanted to have these long term relationships

with the companies that serve us, but now it's possible to

do that not just with companies we know personally, like

the shop around the corner, but actually with organizations

where we've never met anybody.

And these are through technologies like always-on devices,

mobility, artificial intelligence that gives us a

personalized experience.

The ability to connect networks.

All of that is enabling new ways of relating.

The other thing is, the influx of capital, financial capital

that is giving entrepreneurs a longer runway to build

relationships with their customers before they actually

have to generate revenue.

- So the fact that we are always connected, and we have

so many different ways to connect, is enabling these

organizations to think differently about how to be a part

of those connections.

- Yeah, it's like a new palette of colors that you can

use when you're painting your business model.

- I love that.

Can you give us some examples about some companies that

have taken advantage of this new palette?

- Yeah, well there's two groups, there's what I think of as

the digital natives, the Amazons, Linkedin, Netflix, who

started their businesses thinking about the forever

transaction.

Thinking about this long-term, member oriented approach.

And then there are companies that have transformed to

membership models.

Companies like Intuit and Adobe, who have moved from these

anonymous, boxed transactions to a real ongoing relationship

subscription model community with the people they serve.

- I'd love to dive into that second group, because I

imagine a lot of people listening are probably a part of

a more traditional organization.

And they're wondering, yeah I want to be a part of this next

way of thinking about my business model, but I'm not sure

where to begin.

- Yeah.

- So what have you seen companies do well when they're

making the transition from a more sort of anonymous buy

to a more customer focuses, long term relationship service?

- Yeah, so the first thing they do, the minute you have a

good product, it's kind of ironic, but the minute that a

company has a good, successful product, it makes it hard

for them to really go back and be customer focused.

Because now suddenly, they are beholden to the product

that they have created.

- Yeah.

- So the first thing I always suggest is to take a step back

and go look at your customer again.

And try to understand what it is they really need, what

they're trying to accomplish, and how you'd be solving it

maybe if you were starting from scratch.

So you kind of get a whole new set of ideas.

And I know you're really big on design thinking

- [Lisa] Yes.

- And creativity, and this is right up your alley.

That's really where to start, and then it's about doing

small tests and iterations, as opposed to going away and

coming back with like the jazz hands and the big reveal.

(laughing)

Like, "Tada!"

But really, testing with customers and adjusting along

the way.

- It must be really hard to ask them to shed what they know.

I mean, I think sometimes we get stuck with the curse of

knowledge, what we know

- Yes.

- Are there certain prompts you give them to get them into

a more generative mind stance?

- Yeah. So for really big companies I say, what if your most

creative team member left and hooked up with the

technologist from your favorite tech company and a guy

with really deep pockets.

- Oh, okay.

- What would they do?

- I bet that jolts them up.

- Yeah, because so often like, I work with a lot of media

companies for example, and they'll say well, we have a lot

of printing presses, so we really can't move away

from our print, right?

Or we have newspaper delivery people, so we can't

move away from print.

And you think, well gosh, that's not gonna stop a start-up

from going right to digital, which is more convenient

and also has a less capital-intensive model.

- What I love about that prompt is that it's so specific.

I think everyone can imagine their most creative employee.

And then it's not hard to imagine them leaving, and what

that would do to an organization.

So I love that example.

You talk about another example that really captured my

imagination, this "frictionless" car wash.

Can you tell us about that?

- Yeah well, so it's a funny story.

A few weeks ago, I was at the International Carwash

Association annual event.

An event like this one in some ways, but also all about

carwashes, so it's a little different.

And one of the things they were asking me about is,

how do you do unlimited car washes by subscription.

And a lot of the carwash companies are moving toward

that model.

And the main reason they're moving toward it is to have

this forever transaction with the people they serve, who

want a forever promise of always having their car be clean.

That's what they want.

Nobody wants to go to the carwash.

You want your car to always be clean.

But the second thing that they learn, they knew that that

was a real driver, and so they priced it basically it's like

three car washes, the cost of three car washes gives you

unlimited car washes.

But what they realized is that some people who only

got two car washes a month, or even one, that they wanted

unlimited car washes so that they didn't have to talk

to anybody.

They wanted a frictionless carwash.

They said, I will pay a premium so that I can just wave

my card when I come to the carwash and not have to

talk to anybody as I go through, and not have to exchange

money, or leave a tip.

Because those were the moments of friction that made them

dread doing the car wash.

- Interesting.

So what I heard in that is two important things.

One is, can you re-frame the value proposition

- Yeah.

- Going from getting your car washed, to really having

a clean car all the time.

And the other is really paying attention to

those sticking points.

Like who would have thought that talking to somebody would

be the thing that keeps you away from a carwash?

- Yeah, we want connection, but maybe not with our

carwash guy.

(laughing)

- Yes, right, exactly.

So Robbie, you know that at Singularity University we spend

a lot of time talking about impact.

Does the membership economy work in the social sector?

You know are there other examples that you've seen of

organizations that are not necessarily in the corporate

world that are using this strategy?

- Yeah, well you guys talk a lot about grand challenges.

And one organization that I work with, the American Nurses

Association, has a grand challenge going on right now where

they're focused on helping the 3.5 million nurses in the

U.S. get healthy.

Because nurses are, of the five major elements of health

which is like stress, sleep, weight, smoking, and I think

drugs maybe, I think those are the five, they perform

less well than the American population at large,

in four out of five.

So they're really using online community, they're using

their subscription model, they're using their live events,

all to support this initiative, this grand challenge around

making nurses as healthy as possible this year.

- That's really exciting, because of course if nurses are

healthy, then that has this cascading effect for what

happens to all other patients.

- Exactly.

It helps patients, it helps patients' families, it helps

kids, it helps communities, so yeah.

- That's one of the things we talked about when we help

leaders think about how they can all become impact drivers,

is to think about what is the theory of change and how do

you map a system of flows, and this sounds like an

interesting example.

- Yeah.

- So we also have a lot of entrepreneurs in our community.

And many of them come up with new ideas and first think, I'm

gonna give it away for free, the whole "freemium" model

- Yeah, love freemium.

- Tell us what you think about the freemium model?

- So freemium is a hammer, it's a tool.

And there are places where it's the best tool and places

where it's really a clunky tool.

Freemium does three things.

One of them is, it gives people an opportunity to change

behavior by trying something for an ongoing period of time

at a very low cost.

Second thing is it creates a network effect, which is it

creates more value for the other customers.

And the third thing is it serves as a marketing channel.

So if I send you an email and at the bottom of it, like

Hotmail did, it says, "get your own free email account

here", then you're actually part of the channel.

- [Lisa] Right.

- So those are good reasons.

If you don't have one of those three reasons,

don't do freemium.

- Yeah.

I know you talk about Linkedin, I think that's a great

example of freemium as part of a larger strategy.

- Yeah.

- And would love to hear that example played out

with freemium being a part, but not all of

how they think about it.

- Yeah, absolutely.

So I said there were three reasons to use freemium,

Linkedin uses all three.

They use it to change behavior, so we used to use, maybe

people don't remember this, we used to use Rolodex's to keep

track of our contacts, and we used to have physical print

resumes that we used to let people know what we were up to.

So Linkedin wanted to change the behavior to having us post

our resumes, and to keep track of our professional

connections through their community.

So that was the first thing.

Second thing is, Linkedin becomes even more valuable with

each new person that joins, so there's definitely a

network effect.

And the third thing is that most people that are on Linked

in were invited by somebody that's already there.

So actually, the members of Linkedin, the free members

that aren't paying are actually bringing other people in.

And the way that Linkedin pays for itself is through

recruiters, salespeople, and people looking for jobs.

And those three groups are willing to pay a tremendous

premium for access to that large network.

- What I love about that example is that these two business

models, one the freemium, for those of us that just want to

have our professional resume out there, and the other with

the paid membership of the recruiters, they feed off of each

other, right?

- Yes.

- They become more valuable the bigger that they get.

- Yeah.

- And I think that's a really important connection

that is not always made, that sometimes these things

operate separately.

- Right, and the thing that I think you're bringing up also

is that freemium works really well when there's a

network effect.

- Yes.

- But when there's not, you might want to try like a free

trial, like if they're saying I don't know what it tastes

like, then you give them a taste of the best that you've

got, like a bite of your filet mignon.

But if they're like, well I just want something free to fill

me up, then you give them hamburger forever.

And that's really what freemium is.

- Yes, yes interesting.

So Robbie, I think that all leaders are gonna need to

really take a hard look at their business model.

What suggestions would you have for leaders that want to

really understand how to get into the membership economy

and how to make sure that they really are getting their

leadership team prepared for thinking very differently

about strategy?

- Yeah, so I think the first thing is to get them out

talking to customers.

And really understanding, what is the value that they

provide, ya know as Clayton Christensen says, what's the job

that your product does for them, and that's one piece.

Also getting into their shoes and understanding what

technologies they expect and see as the new normal.

And the other thing is not getting too wrapped up in

the technology

Because even though technology is great, it's not great when

it's not in service to an actual benefit for the person

you're trying to serve, the customer.

- That's such a good point that you made.

I mean, we're at Silicon Valley, we get very excited about

technology

- We love technology.

- Sometimes we forget to check if it's actually serving

our customers.

- Right, sometimes it's just about the cup holders.

- That's right.

(laughing)

Sometimes it's just about having the augmented mustache on

the thing and we don't really know if it's actually

adding value.

(laughing)

And do you ever help your clients really understand

their customers differently?

Do you like go on customer visits, or how do you help them

do that?

- Yeah, yeah, absolutely.

So we go on customer visits, we do surveys, we call them up

and talk to them.

We do whatever it takes and one thing that I think, you know

you mentioned that you have very large organizations here

and very small, you know sometimes people say, "Well Robbie,

you don't understand, we're a very small company, we're

lean, we can't talk to our customers."

And I say, you know, the corner store, they can talk to

their customers.

Everybody, you might even have a bigger advantage in

knowing your customer when you actually see them or you

have a limited number of customers.

So while the bigger companies might be using very

sophisticated analytics and research systems.

You don't need that.

Sometimes it's just enough to talk to your customers and

ask them what they need.

- I think that is such an important point, and something

that everybody can do.

If you have not talked to your customer in the last week

- Yeah.

(laughing)

- Go and find a customer and talk to them.

- Yeah.

- Another thing, Robbie, that I know you do is you're a

constant student of different business models, and you've

got lots of examples in your book.

But you'll look at anything from the Crossfit community

- Yeah.

- And really understand how that's taken off, to churches

and other different kinds of organizations.

So how do we become more curious?

How should we look at new businesses?

- Yeah.

- What are some questions we should ask?

- That's a good questions.

So becoming more curious is innate, we all are curious, in

fact if you've been with a four year old recently

- Yes!

- You know we are born to ask questions.

- Yes.

- And over time I think we get embarrassed about it, or we

think we know too much.

So what I suggest is, you know, ask questions.

Look at businesses, think to yourself, "why is this business

successful? What can I learn from this business?"

You know, and putting things together, a lot of people have

said to me, no we want to be the Netflix of our industry.

And on some level you can't copy an organization.

On the other hand, if you say, "what would that look like?"

You'd ask the second question, so okay, great, what would it

look like if you were the Netflix of your industry?

What would that be?

If you Amazon ed your competitors, what would that mean?

And so sometimes just asking the second question is a great

way to really break open a paradigm.

- Great, well so many wonderful things that you had to

share, go and talk to customers, ask better questions, try

to understand which organizations are doing well, and why.

Be curious about it.

Robbie, thank you so much for coming today to talk about

the membership economy and how we could all be better

connectors with our customers so we can build forever

transactions and sustainable organizations.

(Groovy Synth Music)

For more infomation >> Robbie Baxter | "The Membership Economy" | Singularity University - Duration: 15:29.

-------------------------------------------

Are University Admissions Biased? | Simpson's Paradox Part 2 - Duration: 3:37.

Imagine a future cat-topia where both cats and people are applying to the physics and

astronomy departments.

In astronomy, 2 cats are accepted and 2 are rejected, while 1 human is accepted and 1

is rejected.

In physics 1 cat gets in and 2 don't, while 2 humans get in 4 don't.

So, overall at the university, 3 cats are accepted and 4 rejected for a 43% acceptance

rate, while 3 humans are accepted and 5 rejected for a 38% acceptance rate.

Is the university discriminating against humans in its application process?

Possibly not.

That's because if each department reviews its own applications, then the numbers show

that the astronomy department lets in 50% of cats and 50% of humans, which seems fair,

and the physics department lets in 33% of cats and 33% of humans, which again seems

fair.

The reason, then, for the apparent unfairness at the university level is the imbalance in

how many cats and humans apply to each department: more of the cats applied to the astronomy

department, which happened to let in more applicants (regardless of species), while

more of the humans applied to physics, which let in fewer applicants.

This situation is another illustration of Simpson's statistical paradox, and something

like it actually happened at Berkeley in the 1970s, which realized it was letting in 44%

of men applying to the graduate school, but only 35% of women.

Careful analysis was able to show that women tended to apply more to departments that had

less funding and fewer places, like English, and men tended to apply more to less competitive

departments, like engineering.

Thus within each department (which was the level at which applications were evaluated),

there wasn't obvious evidence of gender discrimination among applicants – if anything,

women were favored.

And yet, the unequal distribution of women and men across departments resulted in an

unequal distribution of women and men at the university overall.

The question, then, is what caused the unequal distribution of women and men to begin with?

One can of course imagine a sinister institution knowing how Simpson's paradox works, wanting

to discriminate against a particular group, and thus advertising smaller, more competitive

departments more heavily to that group, and vice-versa for groups they want to promote

. More realistically, certain departments or fields may have reputations for being unwelcoming

and unsupportive towards women even if they let them in fairly, and it's also possible

that aspects of a university itself attract applicants who are more likely to follow gendered

career stereotypes.

But ultimately, as the Berkeley study concluded, the problem is a bigger, societal, one: "Women

are shunted towards fields of study that are generally more crowded, less productive of

completed degrees, less well funded, and that frequently offer poorer professional employment

prospects…

The absence of a demonstrable bias in the admissions system does not give grounds for

concluding that there must be no bias anywhere else in the educational

process."

Those words were written in a statistics paper in 1975.

And more recent statistics tell us that they still remain true today - which is unfortunate

if you think women and men should have equal opportunities and/or be paid equally for equal

work.

So the paradox isn't really in the statistics, since after careful analysis, the statistics

tell us we're biased and even hint at where those biases are (or aren't) coming into

play.

No, the paradox is that we've remained so reluctant to fight our biases, even when they're

put in plain sight.

This video is sponsored by Skillshare, the online learning site with courses on all sorts

of creative, business and technology skills – like proper knife skills, or how to make

animated graphs for a video, or how to fly a drone, or how to design a logo for your

knife-carrying drone-flying animated-graph company, and so on.

You can get two months free by going to skl.sh/MinutePhysics.

Again, that's skl.sh/MinutePhysics

For more infomation >> Are University Admissions Biased? | Simpson's Paradox Part 2 - Duration: 3:37.

-------------------------------------------

2017 Mississippi State University Commercial - Duration: 1:01.

("Hear My Name Ringin'" by Trevor Menear)

(vibrating)

♫ Heard an echo down the well

♫ Where my heart once hung

♫ Shattered all my fortune

♫ While I wait for you to come

♫ Oh, get around me now like a circle round' the sun

♫ Hear my name ringin'

♫ Ringin' when I'm done

(tires squeal)

♫ Hear my name ringin'

♫ Hear it ringin'

♫ Hear my name ringin'

♫ Hear it ringin'

♫ Hear my name ringin'

For more infomation >> 2017 Mississippi State University Commercial - Duration: 1:01.

-------------------------------------------

Luke Richardson - Business with Human Resource Management MSc Student at Northumbria University - Duration: 1:56.

For more infomation >> Luke Richardson - Business with Human Resource Management MSc Student at Northumbria University - Duration: 1:56.

-------------------------------------------

Irene Ann Gascoigne - Nursing (Child) MNurs Student at Northumbria University - Duration: 2:31.

For more infomation >> Irene Ann Gascoigne - Nursing (Child) MNurs Student at Northumbria University - Duration: 2:31.

-------------------------------------------

Sustainability Studies Minor - University of Minnesota - Duration: 1:44.

In our fast changing world it's important to pay attention to our relationship with

the environment.

The University of Minnesota offers a sustainability minor, an interdisciplinary approach to learning

and discovering solutions for a large variety of issues at the local and global scale.

The sustainability job market is expected to dramatically increase, so learn more about

how you can pair this flexible minor with your major.

My name is Christina and my major is english literature.

My name is Jesse Harris and my major is the bachelor of design and architecture.

Would definitely be the people and especially being able to do things in a hands on experience

like we got to do in one of the courses this last fall like visiting an organic farm.

The sustainability minor was really, it fit well with my interest in architecture and

I also had a general interest in sustainable practices and so this was a way for me to

get college credit for it.

The sustainability minor requires 18 credits, with 2 core classes and a large selection

of electives that are divided into four major categories: Biophysical Sciences, Design and

Technology, Economics and Policy, and Social Science and Humanities.

There are also a few classes that don't belong in any of these categories.

Students in this minor come from a broad range of majors and are dedicated to making a positive

difference on the world.

Schedule a time with an advisor to learn if the sustainability minor is for you!

For more infomation >> Sustainability Studies Minor - University of Minnesota - Duration: 1:44.

-------------------------------------------

Gardner-Webb University Octoberfest 2017 - Duration: 1:38.

[MUSIC]

And they're taking pictures with us.

We have these little cut-outs for them.

You see one of their faces, like, light up.

Like, "Oh my gosh, it's Beauty and the Beast!" And they come over to us wanting a picture.

Octoberfest. Gardner-Webb. It's awesome. Because we get to do it as a family.

That's right!

It's just a giant fall festival for our community.

We reach out to all of our local elementary schools. All those children.

Their families, friends. Just a good, free, family fun event.

You get a lot of candy! And you get to

see all the cute kids dress up.

[MUSIC]

We are fishing. So the kids come up,

throw the line over, and then whenever they pull on it they get a fish.

I'm not really here. I'm a fish.

So, we got kids from all over the community. We got

booths everywhere. We got athletic teams have a booth.

We've got academic clubs. It's a pretty awesome day.

Rocky Balboa.

[MUSIC]

We made it like 200 cookies for all of the kids, and they just come here and decorate them.

This place has so much free candy, and it's just so gnarly dude!

I love it here, because I get to see all the, you know, amazing children. They're so cute.

[Music]

For more infomation >> Gardner-Webb University Octoberfest 2017 - Duration: 1:38.

-------------------------------------------

Kristy Weegram - Occupational and Organisational Psychology MSc Student at Northumbria University - Duration: 2:06.

For more infomation >> Kristy Weegram - Occupational and Organisational Psychology MSc Student at Northumbria University - Duration: 2:06.

-------------------------------------------

Rosie Locke - Health Psychology MSc Student at Northumbria University - Duration: 1:54.

I'm Rosie Locke I'm here doing health psychology which is a taught

postgraduate course here in Northumbria

I was doing my undergraduate degree here

in psychology when I finished there that then went on to help me get a job as an

assistant psychologist been doing that for a couple of years and then I've come

back here to do health psychology now to kind of supplement my job and

help me progress further in that job so kind of combine full circle

So I decided to come back to Northumbria

and I think because of the really good facilities and

the options that you have here it's got great research facilities

your working alongside you know well renowned academics and the opportunities

that give you here help you in the real world you know so they're teaching me

things that I wouldn't know if I wasn't here and the things that they've learned

along the way which is really helpful too again for me to progress, so after

course I'm hoping to either stay here and do a PhD and so either go onto do my

stage 2 and health psychology which this course really sets you up for

alternatively I move into clinical psychology so again do my PhD in that

and but this has given me the skills the research skills giving me the knowledge

of Health to be able to do either one of those

There's loads of you here in North East

and one of my favourite places is going to the beach which is 20 minutes

on the Metro and hop on and but there's loads of other things through here as

often an international market in town and there's loads of kind of restaurants

bars you can go to as well but as well you've got the kind of the surrounding

areas the countryside so you've got the hub of the city 20 minutes out of town

we've got the country so you're never short of things to do

I'm proud to be at Northumbria University because the research I'm doing here

is helping me progress in my future and in military psychology

For more infomation >> Rosie Locke - Health Psychology MSc Student at Northumbria University - Duration: 1:54.

-------------------------------------------

University of Utah: Student from China killed in carjacking - ABC News - Duration: 2:07.

For more infomation >> University of Utah: Student from China killed in carjacking - ABC News - Duration: 2:07.

-------------------------------------------

Man at large after allegedly killing University of Utah student also wanted for Colorado homicide - Duration: 2:44.

Thanks For Watching!

Không có nhận xét nào:

Đăng nhận xét