Thứ Hai, 2 tháng 7, 2018

Auto news on Youtube Jul 2 2018

hey everyone! welcome back to our channel!

today we're gonna be answering a question that a lot of you guys have for us!

how do we edit our photos? without further ado, let's get into it!

to start off, you will need some kind of editing software

we use adobe lightroom which is free it looks like this

go into the app and press this little button in the bottom right corner to open a new project

for this video, i am going to be using this photo

to start, we usually adjust the exposure depending on how good the lighting is

if it's darker, then we put the exposure up and if it's lighter, then we may wanna put

it down a little bit next, we are going to work with the contrast

i kind of like to think of the contrast as kind of defining the facial features a little

bit more and making them darker so, when we put the contrast down, it kind

of gets a little hazy and cloudy do the same with the highlights, shadows,

whites, and blacks until it looks perfect to you

then you click the little temperature icon right underneath to adjust the color settings

basically, the temperature is just like making it more warm colored or making it more cool

colored so, if you want more warm colors you put the

temperature up and if you want it cooler colored you put the temperature down

we don't really mess with the temperature tint is like the same thing and it will tint

the photo, like adding a filter, to a color what we use the most is vibrance and saturation

vibrance makes the colors pop even more and saturation just makes everything brighter

adding too much vibrance or too much saturation can make your dolls look really really orange

and not good we move on to the next icon and we only use

clarity here because we do not need the rest only put it up a tiny bit because if you put

it up all the way, it makes your doll look like a drawing

finally we click on this icon and we click enable lens corrections

and that will slightly make your photo better and clearer

this is a before and after of the photo we just edited!

alright, so i hope this video helped you guys! sorry it's so short because we don't edit

our photos that much but i hope this answers all your guys' questions

about how we edit our photos see ya next time!

bye!

For more infomation >> ANSWERING ONE OF OUR MOST FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS! - Duration: 2:28.

-------------------------------------------

🔴 "It must be replaced urgently!", Rod Rosenshtein will answer for his crimes - Duration: 14:06.

Hill this week is House Oversight Committee chairman trey Gowdy grilled

deputy AG rot Rosenstein on the Russian investigation saying it's time to wrap

this thing up if you have evidence of wrongdoing by any member of the Trump

campaign campaign present it to the damn grand jury whatever you got finish it

the hell up because this country is being torn apart Oh

so does he have a point let's bring in Alan Dershowitz Harvard Law Professor

lifelong Democrat and author of the case against impeaching trum professor always

good to have you with us thank you look he speaks for a lot of Americans that

feel the exact same way at this point they're angry they're wondering what are

we still doing here what is your response well these kind of Special

Counsel investigators almost always take a long time that's one of the problems

with having a special counsel they start from scratch they don't have people on

board who are in the US Attorneys offices they have to organize right from

the beginning and the Clinton probe took a long time the iran-contra probe took a

long time so there's no surprise that this one's taking a long time what is

surprising is that Ron Rosenstein is still supervising it more and more

information is coming out about his conflict of interest we've now seen

stories in The New York Times about how he may have regretted writ writing

letter and he felt he was used writing the letter he is a central witness in

this entire obstruction of justice if it involves the firing of column E how did

he still stay on the case I wish they would focus much more on that because he

is with Hughes he is disqualified he ought to be replaced so professor Alexei

however slow the process down even more sir pardon me there but so what would be

the remedy do you think first of all because you know if the president fires

Rosenstein as has been speculated before he's going to get in more political hot

water to look like he's hiding something so how do you deal with the fact that

Rosen Stein is conflicted as you say there are many ways of doing it number

one you could bring a lawsuit challenging

has continued appearance as the person who's supervising the whole

investigation second you can bring an ethics charge you can file an ethics

charge with the bars to which he is a member saying he has no ethical right to

remain on the case but I just don't understand if somebody who's totally

Galactic's for over 25 years of Harvard Law School the first thing you learn is

you can't be both the prosecutor and a witness it can so much influence your

role as a prosecutor to know that if the case goes a certain way then you are

away so it goes another way maybe you're not a witness

you'll look terrible this way you'll look better the other way he has real

self-interest people talk about the president not hardening himself with the

president not marking people who were involved here you have the person who's

leading the investigation who has an obvious interest in the way in which the

investigation is going to go involving his own participation that just

shouldn't be the lab professor Gerson looks real quick um it looks like the

president's gonna get a new a new appointee to the Supreme Court and he's

running up against a lot of opposition what do you think he's gonna do well I

think there are two questions about right to life if he appoints somebody

who believes that Roe versus Wade is wrong but should be overruled because

it's been the law for a long time that's one thing second if he appoints somebody

you think she'd be a rule and left to the states that's the second thing but

he might even appoint somebody who believes there is a right to life a

constitutional right to life which would mean that the president the supreme

court would rule that no state could even permit abortion that New York and

California would have to abolish their laws permitting abortion if there is a

constitutional right to life then states wouldn't have the power to permit women

to have abortions and we have to know what the president's position is on that

is the anti role raid Roe versus Wade number one that is it's wrong but it

shouldn't be a rule number two it should be overrule or there is a right to life

which means that you can't have abortion in any states we have to know where the

president stands on that thing and whether his appointee represents any one

of those three because you know and all of this and professor by the way

I very rudely last week asked you about the Red Sox no longer being in first

place without giving you a chance sales this pitching will get rid of your sale

today that's right no time to give a react I don't want to be right there I'm

sorry unfair that's always love your mind the definitive book the illicit

scheme to clear Hillary Clinton and frame Donald Trump Fox News legal

analyst Greg Jarrett let's start with you from the legal standpoint I captured

a lot of inconsistencies and I know you did well one could say they were lies by

Rod Rosenstein for example he denied ever threatening members of the

Intelligence Committee and the staff in a January 10th meeting in which he

threatened to get his hands on their emails texts and phone records that's a

little scary in America I talked to two people who are in on that meeting they

used the word threatened and that he said he was threatening to obtain those

texts and emails and so forth so that did not appear to be terribly truthful

by him he will also wasn't truthful when he said I'm not withholding any evidence

of subpoenaed records well his own letters refusing to turn over the

documents or evidence that he's withholding and yet he said I'm not

withholding there wasn't a lot of truth in Rod Rosenstein today let me go get

your initial reaction Sarah Carter I think that when trey gowdy when

representative trey Gowdy questioned him and made a statement saying if you have

any evidence of this rod Rosenstein let's just get it out right now stop

dragging the American public this administration in our country through

the mud if you have evidence that anything happened with the Trump

administration with President Trump you know get it out there let us know what

it is but he never once has done that and if you look at the IG report shine

and you look at what happened today on Capitol Hill and how he evaded and

avoided questions and I tell you Greg is 100% right I've spoken to similar

sources who have been in those one person to that was personally the

victim of the temper tantrum absolutely a direct conversation that was related

to me so rod Rosenstein flat-out lied he lied

to Congress and he lied to the American people and we just got a call a spade a

spade call it what it is and if you look at the IG report I want to go back to

that really quick and we look at struck himself I was looking at it in more

detail in talking with some sources tonight and you know there's one point

where struck tries to explain the insurance policy question remember in

August that text message that he sent to Lisa Paige about having an insurance

policy and talking with Andy McCabe and he explains it away as saying well we

were talking about how aggressive we were going to be or how a work we were

going to be with this investigation and when I was talking to FBI sources about

this they said that is so telling because at that moment in time when he

let that out to Horowitz when he made that statement he was basically saying

we're gonna go after Trump even if it means going after the people around him

even if it means putting disinformation out there in the media even if it means

arresting people for crimes that were committed ten years ago or maybe they're

not even crimes but just giving that or around the president so the chaos here

really has been the FBI and the people on the seventh floor and the DOJ and not

even so much the Russians anymore I mean the real chaos in our country is coming

from them you know Rosen's he said I'm not trying to hide

anything you know uh let me I just made a short list and I wrote it down before

the show okay we'll stop Trump they hid that from everybody for a period of time

war he withheld the fact that struck was a personal friend of Judge Rudolph

Contreras which you mentioned on this program last night they refused to

initially remember he begged up to the last minute Paul Ryan not to release

what became the new Nest memo which told us about FISA abuse the DOJ tried to

hide from Congress the fact that two of the most important investigators on both

the hillary and russia probes with vehemently antitrump ii didn't want that

out either and remember December 2017 five months after struck and Paige was

shoved out the door it was the Inspector General that released the struck

that's four page text and that's what he is shortlist Frank and what did Rosen

Stein say of the behavior of Peter structure day he called it inappropriate

which has to be the most lawful understatement of all time especially

when you consider the IG said that this is a man who had a willingness to abuse

his position of power to influence an election and but to rod Rosenstein oh it

you know it's just inappropriate things that stand out we both we all three of

us have talked to at least one person I've talked to one you talked to - Sarah

how many sources do you have about his temper and that he made the threat that

he denied today I have at least four sources okay well you're working harder

than both Greg and I use himself then structs actions as you just pointed

highly inappropriate no that would be rigging an investigation to influence a

presidential election and as your book says the scheme to clear Hillary and

frame Trump that's what happened Rosen Stein said today if it's appropriate

I'll recuse myself it was appropriate long time ago I'm ago

he is a witness investigator prosecutor judge and jury all rolled in the one

that again he is the witness key witness investigator he's supervising the

prosecution which makes him a prosecutor and he's also the judge and jury because

he decides whether any charges would be brought

why is he why is he like mad at me by name and not you and Sarah I'm taken

they tried to undermine it to favor one candidate and screw the other candidate

that's why this matters and why the rest of the suit ignore this story I don't

know Shawn it matters because they they weaponized they weaponized

our tools of law enforcement the the NSA the CIA the FBI and everything else I

mean this is such an enormous investigation we haven't even talked

about the unmasking yet so they recognize the tools I know and the

weapon we need to get back to that we need to have

answers if the United States is going to move forward if we're going to clean up

our system our FBI and our intelligence agencies we need to know what happened

and the truth needs to come out and the people that abused it need to be removed

one of the most striking moments occurred today when he was asked about

Muller's not one but two glaring conflicts of interests that are

disqualifying Rosenstein so I I don't know of any conflict of interest with

mr. Muller he apparently doesn't read newspapers because dozens and dozens of

law professors and lawyers have written a myriad of columns explaining the

disqualifying conflicts of interest of robert muller but Rosenstein is either a

modern-day Machiavelli or he is the most oblivious person to ever hold such a

high facility said to me today the and I really believed them when they said hey

you're trying to do this because you're undermining Muller then you're missing

the whole story but the more important thing that they said here is is they

don't get it that they really believe that these guys and I'll brothers this

era that they actually think that they were better smarter and that they think

they're the super patriots and that we the people are stupid and that they knew

better which is why they had to save Hillary and had to undermine Trump but

now they're calm they undermined they undermine the American people they

undermine the system that our nation is founded on China and just look at the

most disparaging comments that struck and Page said about people that shop at

Walmart the American people in Pennsylvania smell them there's nothing

more disgusting well no there's nothing more than disgusting than thinking that

you know everything in thinking that you know everything and that's the reason

why President Trump won let's be honest people were sick and tired sick and

tired of being told they weren't smart enough they're not good enough they

don't know what to do and you know what the American people said you know what

we are smart enough we are good enough and we don't really care what you have

to say because we live in this country we're gonna vote for who we want to vote

for and if Trump hadn't of won if Trump would not have won this election think

about what the alternative would be we would never know what happened

Fox com please mark that that Sarah monologue you get the last word

people like Rosenstein and Comey and struck and Lisa page and mccabe and the

whole gang are a symbol of corruption and and how absolute power corrupts

absolutely we haven't been wrong on one thing have

we not yet not yet it's scary and the media has ignored it frankly you guys

deserve Pulitzer Prizes amazing I can't review books our great job as always

when we come back don't touch that

Không có nhận xét nào:

Đăng nhận xét